PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGTX vs. CSUAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGTX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Symmetry Panoramic Tax-Managed Global Equity Fund (SPGTX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGTX achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than CSUAX's 12.09% return.


SPGTX

1D
0.14%
1M
0.48%
6M
8.64%
YTD
13.96%
1Y
26.60%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.13%

CSUAX

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.23%
6M
8.33%
YTD
12.09%
1Y
17.26%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
7.22%
ALL TIME*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SPGTX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPGTX
Symmetry Panoramic Tax-Managed Global Equity Fund
13.96%22.41%10.43%20.78%-14.10%19.43%8.53%24.65%-6.33%
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
12.09%14.30%8.30%2.09%-5.20%16.24%-1.65%24.26%-4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGTX and CSUAX is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2018

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between SPGTX and CSUAX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGTX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPGTX
SPGTX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SPGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CSUAX
CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPGTX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Tax-Managed Global Equity Fund (SPGTX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPGTXCSUAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.01

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.01

9.45

+2.56

SPGTX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGTX and CSUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPGTX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGTX drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGTX and CSUAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGTXCSUAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-52.20%

+17.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-5.99%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-11.83%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

-20.45%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-1.95%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-8.39%

+3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.90%

+0.22%

Volatility

SPGTX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

Symmetry Panoramic Tax-Managed Global Equity Fund (SPGTX) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 2.93%. This indicates that SPGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGTXCSUAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

2.93%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

8.16%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

10.13%

+2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

13.00%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

14.88%

+1.50%

SPGTX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGTX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPGTX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

SPGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than CSUAX's 7.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
7.63%8.09%2.23%2.17%3.55%2.95%1.30%1.52%2.08%5.00%2.04%6.20%
SPGTX
Symmetry Panoramic Tax-Managed Global Equity Fund
3.18%3.62%3.74%2.12%1.76%1.56%1.22%1.24%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPGTX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPGTX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to CSUAX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGTX dropped -35.10% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.

SPGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGTX and CSUAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer