SPGP vs. EMXC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SPGP (Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPGP is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P 500 GARP Index, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPGP returned 7.97%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for EMXC. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPGP charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.

Performance

SPGP vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGP achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 37.25% return.

SPGP

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 6.06%
• 6M: 5.64%
• 1Y: 16.13%
• 3Y*: 11.97%
• 5Y*: 7.97%
• 10Y*: 15.11%

EMXC

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: 37.25%
• 6M: 42.23%
• 1Y: 65.26%
• 3Y*: 26.47%
• 5Y*: 12.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGP vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF	6.06%	9.80%	8.48%	20.29%	-13.83%	35.72%	15.92%	39.16%	1.68%	9.66%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	37.25%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	12.76%	15.80%	-12.96%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGP and EMXC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017	0.62

The correlation between SPGP and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPGP vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPGP	EMXC
Technology	22.8%	45.0%
Financial Services	22.2%	19.6%
Consumer Cyclical	18.0%	4.5%
Industrials	16.8%	8.3%
Energy	7.1%	4.2%
Communication Services	6.6%	3.4%
Healthcare	3.8%	2.2%
Real Estate	2.7%	1.0%
Basic Materials	-	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.9%
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

SPGP vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGP

SPGP Risk / Return Rank: 34
SPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 39

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 89
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGP vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPGP	EMXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	2.74	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	3.35	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.50	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	4.55	-3.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.54	17.51	-11.98

SPGP vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGP and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPGP vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGP drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, roughly equal to the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP and EMXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPGP	EMXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.08%	-42.81%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.15%	-14.41%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.87%	-19.12%	-3.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.87%	-28.91%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-4.12%	+3.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-10.17%	+5.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	3.74%	-0.82%

Volatility

SPGP vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) is 5.43%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that SPGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPGP	EMXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.43%	12.83%	-7.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.24%	21.90%	-9.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.63%	23.90%	-8.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.60%	18.00%	+0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.23%	20.07%	+1.16%

SPGP vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPGP vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

SPGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than EMXC's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	2.05%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF	0.88%	1.04%	1.38%	1.24%	1.22%	0.69%	1.10%	0.86%	0.95%	0.68%	0.89%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPGP and EMXC in my portfolio?

SPGP and EMXC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPGP or EMXC?

EMXC has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to SPGP (5.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGP dropped -42.08% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

Which ETF is better, SPGP or EMXC?

On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 12.14% vs 7.97% for SPGP. On fees, SPGP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 5.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPGP or EMXC?

Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 7.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPGP or EMXC?

SPGP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPGP or EMXC?

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.88% for SPGP.

What is the main difference between SPGP and EMXC?

SPGP is categorized as Multi-factor, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SPGP and 0.49% for EMXC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.