SPGM vs. SBIT

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPGM is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Index, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPGM returned 25.35% vs 113.21% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. SPGM charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

SPGM vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 33.13% return.

SPGM

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 9.50%
• YTD: 12.31%
• 1Y: 25.35%
• 3Y*: 19.37%
• 5Y*: 11.31%
• 10Y*: 12.68%

SBIT

• 1D: -7.55%
• 1M: -6.22%
• 6M: 56.76%
• YTD: 33.13%
• 1Y: 113.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGM vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	12.31%	23.62%	8.49%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	33.13%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGM and SBIT is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.43

Return for Risk

SPGM vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGM

SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 72
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 48
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGM vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPGM	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.28	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	1.96	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.23	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.37	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.56	5.39	+6.17

SPGM vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGM Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGM and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPGM vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPGM	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.97%	-91.35%	+57.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.50%	-47.94%	+38.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-78.87%	+77.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.78%	-68.85%	+64.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	21.08%	-18.88%

Volatility

SPGM vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is 4.01%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 23.66%. This indicates that SPGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPGM	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	23.66%	-19.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.58%	69.36%	-57.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.78%	88.70%	-74.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	96.93%	-80.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	96.93%	-79.50%

SPGM vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPGM vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than SBIT's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	4.30%	0.52%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	1.80%	1.89%	1.98%	2.09%	2.37%	1.94%	1.45%	2.46%	1.89%	2.29%	1.87%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPGM and SBIT in my portfolio?

SPGM and SBIT have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPGM or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (23.66%) compared to SPGM (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, SPGM or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 113.21% vs 25.35% for SPGM. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPGM has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPGM or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 113.21% return vs 25.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPGM or SBIT?

SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPGM or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 1.80% for SPGM.

What is the main difference between SPGM and SBIT?

SPGM is categorized as Global Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. SPGM tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPGM and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.