SPGM vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 10, 2026

SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC World IMI, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SPGM returned 12.85%/yr vs 68.44%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SPGM vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGM has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 12.85%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 68.44% annualized return.

SPGM

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 6M: 11.12%
• 1Y: 27.63%
• 3Y*: 20.31%
• 5Y*: 10.91%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

NVDA

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -3.14%
• YTD: 11.77%
• 6M: 12.69%
• 1Y: 46.17%
• 3Y*: 75.23%
• 5Y*: 64.35%
• 10Y*: 68.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGM vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	10.39%	23.62%	16.75%	21.34%	-17.53%	21.13%	15.28%	26.58%	-10.12%	23.26%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	11.77%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGM and NVDA is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2012	0.49

The correlation between SPGM and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SPGM vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGM

SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 72
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 77
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGM vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPGM	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.34	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	1.91	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.23	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	2.29	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.03	5.56	+7.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPGM vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGM Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGM and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPGM	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	1.34	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	1.25	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	1.38	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.62	+0.03

Drawdowns

SPGM vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPGM	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.97%	-89.72%	+55.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.50%	-20.21%	+10.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.90%	-36.88%	+19.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.93%	-66.34%	+40.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.97%	-66.34%	+32.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.05%	-11.58%	+8.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-36.19%	+31.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	8.33%	-6.20%

Volatility

SPGM vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is 4.52%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.01%. This indicates that SPGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPGM	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	13.01%	-8.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.85%	26.36%	-15.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.26%	34.74%	-21.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.09%	51.75%	-35.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.59%	49.85%	-32.26%

Dividends

SPGM vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	1.83%	1.89%	1.98%	2.09%	2.37%	1.94%	1.45%	2.46%	1.89%	2.29%	1.87%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPGM and NVDA in my portfolio?

SPGM and NVDA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPGM or NVDA?

NVDA has higher volatility (13.01%) compared to SPGM (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.