PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGM vs. MGGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGM vs. MGGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio (MGGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly higher than MGGIX's 5.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGM has underperformed MGGIX with an annualized return of 12.95%, while MGGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.61% annualized return.


SPGM

1D
-0.87%
1M
4.94%
YTD
12.88%
6M
13.62%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
12.95%

MGGIX

1D
1.84%
1M
9.16%
YTD
5.60%
6M
-3.45%
1Y
-4.14%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGM vs. MGGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
12.88%23.62%16.75%21.34%-17.53%21.13%15.28%26.58%-10.12%23.26%
MGGIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio
5.60%1.86%27.50%49.70%-41.57%0.22%55.49%35.44%-5.65%49.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGM and MGGIX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2012

0.69

The correlation between SPGM and MGGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGM vs. MGGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGM
SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MGGIX
MGGIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MGGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MGGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGM vs. MGGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio (MGGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGMMGGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

-0.16

+2.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.39

-0.07

+3.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

0.99

+0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

-0.13

+3.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.14

-0.28

+15.43

SPGM vs. MGGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGM Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the MGGIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGM and MGGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGMMGGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

-0.16

+2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.12

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.59

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.53

+0.13

Drawdowns

SPGM vs. MGGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum MGGIX drawdown of -59.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and MGGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGMMGGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-59.08%

+25.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-27.65%

+18.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-27.65%

+10.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

-51.02%

+25.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-51.60%

+17.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-10.06%

+9.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-11.23%

+6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

12.35%

-10.25%

Volatility

SPGM vs. MGGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is 3.92%, while Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio (MGGIX) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that SPGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGMMGGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

5.89%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

19.04%

-8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

21.58%

-8.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

26.00%

-9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

23.05%

-5.48%

SPGM vs. MGGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MGGIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPGM vs. MGGIX - Dividend Comparison

SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while MGGIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGGIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio
0.00%0.00%9.27%2.13%22.94%4.92%1.16%0.00%0.79%0.39%7.04%1.26%
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
1.79%1.89%1.98%2.09%2.37%1.94%1.45%2.46%1.89%2.29%1.87%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPGM and MGGIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGGIX has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to SPGM (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs MGGIX's -59.08%.

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGM and MGGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer