SPGM vs. GLD
SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SPGM is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC World IMI, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPGM returned 12.95%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for GLD. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPGM charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
SPGM vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPGM having a 12.95% annualized return and GLD not far ahead at 13.12%.
SPGM
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 31.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
SPGM vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 12.88% | 23.62% | 16.75% | 21.34% | -17.53% | 21.13% | 15.28% | 26.58% | -10.12% | 23.26% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPGM and GLD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2012 | 0.09 |
Over the past year, SPGM and GLD have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.
SPGM vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPGM
GLD
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPGM
GLD
-
Financial Services
SPGM
GLD
-
Industrials
SPGM
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPGM
GLD
-
Communication Services
SPGM
GLD
-
Healthcare
SPGM
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
SPGM
GLD
-
Energy
SPGM
GLD
-
Basic Materials
SPGM
GLD
Utilities
SPGM
GLD
-
Real Estate
SPGM
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPGM vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
SPGM
GLD
SPGM vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPGM | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.47 | 1.21 | +1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.39 | 1.60 | +1.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.24 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 1.68 | +1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 4.15 | +10.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPGM | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 1.21 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 1.01 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.83 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.60 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
SPGM vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPGM | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -45.56% | +11.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -19.21% | +9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | -19.21% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | -21.03% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.97% | -22.00% | -11.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -17.75% | +16.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -16.16% | +11.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 7.73% | -5.63% |
Volatility
SPGM vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is 3.92%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that SPGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPGM | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 5.51% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | 23.16% | -12.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 26.61% | -13.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 18.00% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 15.95% | +1.62% |
SPGM vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPGM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPGM vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPGM and GLD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to SPGM (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 12.95% for SPGM. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPGM has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 12.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
SPGM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
SPGM is categorized as Global Equities, while GLD is Gold. SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPGM and 0.40% for GLD.
SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPGM and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer