PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPFFX vs. MUHLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sphere 500 Fossil Free Fund (SPFFX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPFFX
Sphere 500 Fossil Free Fund
-6.37%18.12%25.13%29.48%-20.03%9.04%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
9.11%17.82%3.38%13.92%2.89%9.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPFFX achieves a -6.37% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 9.11% return.


SPFFX

1D
3.20%
1M
-5.41%
YTD
-6.37%
6M
-4.47%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
10Y*

MUHLX

1D
2.42%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
9.11%
6M
10.37%
1Y
22.96%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPFFX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPFFX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPFFX
SPFFX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SPFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SPFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MUHLX
MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sphere 500 Fossil Free Fund (SPFFX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPFFXMUHLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

1.42

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

1.97

-0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.37

-0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.92

8.57

-2.66

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPFFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPFFX and MUHLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPFFXMUHLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.42

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.51

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between SPFFX and MUHLX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

SPFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, more than MUHLX's 3.06% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPFFX
Sphere 500 Fossil Free Fund
7.26%6.80%1.06%1.32%0.73%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
3.06%3.34%0.58%0.89%6.80%7.77%10.28%1.26%14.70%4.30%0.00%11.02%

Drawdowns

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPFFX drawdown since its inception was -25.11%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFFX and MUHLX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPFFXMUHLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.11%

-62.05%

+36.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.14%

-10.23%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.89%

-5.65%

-2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-10.81%

+4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.83%

+0.07%

Volatility

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

Sphere 500 Fossil Free Fund (SPFFX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) have volatilities of 5.90% and 6.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPFFXMUHLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.90%

6.01%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

12.06%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.36%

16.85%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

14.77%

+2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

17.04%

+0.25%