PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPFFX vs. MUHLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sphere 500 Climate Fund (SPFFX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPFFX achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 11.61% return.


SPFFX

1D
1.92%
1M
-1.08%
6M
8.14%
YTD
8.82%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.19%

MUHLX

1D
0.59%
1M
2.71%
6M
4.85%
YTD
11.61%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
10.68%
ALL TIME*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPFFX
Sphere 500 Climate Fund
8.82%18.12%25.13%29.48%-20.03%9.04%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
11.61%17.82%3.38%13.92%2.89%10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SPFFX and MUHLX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2021

0.68

The correlation between SPFFX and MUHLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPFFX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPFFX
SPFFX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SPFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SPFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

MUHLX
MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sphere 500 Climate Fund (SPFFX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPFFXMUHLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.18

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

6.46

+0.22

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPFFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPFFX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPFFX drawdown since its inception was -25.11%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFFX and MUHLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPFFXMUHLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.11%

-62.05%

+36.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.75%

-10.23%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.97%

-18.63%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-3.48%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-10.75%

+4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.45%

-0.78%

Volatility

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

Sphere 500 Climate Fund (SPFFX) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) at 2.72%. This indicates that SPFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPFFXMUHLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

2.72%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

10.95%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

14.51%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

14.49%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

17.04%

+0.12%

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPFFX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPFFX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

SPFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than MUHLX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
2.99%3.34%0.58%0.89%6.80%7.77%10.28%1.26%14.70%4.30%0.00%11.02%
SPFFX
Sphere 500 Climate Fund
6.25%6.80%1.06%1.32%0.73%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPFFX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPFFX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to MUHLX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPFFX dropped -25.11% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

MUHLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPFFX and MUHLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer