PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPFF vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPFF vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPFF achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -7.27% return.


SPFF

1D
-0.51%
1M
-2.26%
6M
0.70%
YTD
3.84%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
1.47%
10Y*
2.70%

SHLD

1D
-0.61%
1M
-5.92%
6M
-22.32%
YTD
-7.27%
1Y
-0.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPFF vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
3.84%7.52%8.62%4.85%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-7.27%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SPFF and SHLD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPFF vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPFF
SPFF Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SPFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPFF Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SPFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPFF Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPFF vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPFFSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.01

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

-0.03

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.85

-0.08

+3.93

SPFF vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPFF Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPFF and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPFF vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPFF drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFF and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPFFSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.92%

-25.40%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-25.40%

+17.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-22.99%

+19.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-3.90%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

10.30%

-7.65%

Volatility

SPFF vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) is 3.11%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that SPFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPFFSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

8.28%

-5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

19.79%

-11.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.97%

25.12%

-15.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.08%

21.54%

-10.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.54%

21.54%

-8.00%

SPFF vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPFF has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPFF vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

SPFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, more than SHLD's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.71%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
6.62%6.47%6.39%6.64%7.15%5.78%5.75%5.97%7.60%7.24%7.04%7.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPFF and SHLD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to SPFF (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPFF dropped -35.92% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, SPFF leads with 10.18% vs -0.87% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPFF has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPFF has performed better with a 10.18% return vs -0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SPFF.

SPFF has the higher dividend yield at 6.62%, compared with 0.71% for SHLD.

SPFF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. SPFF tracks S&P Enhanced Yield North American Preferred Stock Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SPFF and 0.50% for SHLD.

SPFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPFF and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer