SPFF vs. QPFF
SPFF (Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF) and QPFF (American Century Quality Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. SPFF is passively managed, while QPFF is actively managed. SPFF charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for QPFF.
Performance
SPFF vs. QPFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPFF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 8.28%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
QPFF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPFF vs. QPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SPFF Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF | 6.50% |
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% |
SPFF vs. QPFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPFF
QPFF
Financial Services
Technology
-
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
SPFF
QPFF
Technology
SPFF
QPFF
-
Utilities
SPFF
QPFF
Healthcare
SPFF
QPFF
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPFF
QPFF
Basic Materials
SPFF
QPFF
Real Estate
SPFF
QPFF
Communication Services
SPFF
QPFF
Industrials
SPFF
QPFF
Consumer Defensive
SPFF
-
QPFF
-
Energy
SPFF
-
QPFF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPFF vs. QPFF — Risk / Return Rank
SPFF
QPFF
SPFF vs. QPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPFF | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPFF | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SPFF vs. QPFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPFF drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, which is greater than QPFF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFF and QPFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPFF | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.92% | 0.00% | -35.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | 0.00% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | 0.00% | -4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | — | — |
Volatility
SPFF vs. QPFF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPFF | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.53% | 0.00% | +9.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 0.00% | +10.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 0.00% | +13.51% |
SPFF vs. QPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPFF has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QPFF's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPFF vs. QPFF - Dividend Comparison
SPFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, while QPFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPFF Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF | 6.34% | 6.47% | 6.39% | 6.64% | 7.15% | 5.78% | 5.75% | 5.97% | 7.60% | 7.24% | 7.04% | 7.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QPFF is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QPFF is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SPFF.
SPFF has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 0.00% for QPFF.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SPFF and 0.33% for QPFF.
Find the right allocation for SPFF and QPFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer