PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPFF vs. PRFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPFF vs. PRFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPFF achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly higher than PRFD's 1.40% return.


SPFF

1D
-0.20%
1M
3.90%
YTD
6.91%
6M
8.28%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
3.13%

PRFD

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.56%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPFF vs. PRFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
6.91%7.52%8.62%-4.22%
PRFD
PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
1.40%8.45%9.92%1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SPFF and PRFD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023

0.50

The correlation between SPFF and PRFD shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPFF vs. PRFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPFF
PRFD

Financial Services

54.4%
2.0%

Technology

18.3%

-

Utilities

14.2%

-

Healthcare

3.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%

-

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Communication Services

2.0%
0.3%

Industrials

1.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

SPFF
54.4%
PRFD
2.0%

Technology

SPFF
18.3%
PRFD

-

Utilities

SPFF
14.2%
PRFD

-

Healthcare

SPFF
3.2%
PRFD

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPFF
3.0%
PRFD

-

Basic Materials

SPFF
2.6%
PRFD

-

Real Estate

SPFF
2.1%
PRFD

-

Communication Services

SPFF
2.0%
PRFD
0.3%

Industrials

SPFF
1.8%
PRFD

-

Consumer Defensive

SPFF

-

PRFD

-

Energy

SPFF

-

PRFD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPFF vs. PRFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPFF
SPFF Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SPFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPFF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPFF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PRFD
PRFD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PRFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFD Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPFF vs. PRFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPFFPRFDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.46

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

10.14

-2.68

SPFF vs. PRFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPFF Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the PRFD Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPFF and PRFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPFFPRFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.51

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

1.31

-1.01

Drawdowns

SPFF vs. PRFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPFF drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, which is greater than PRFD's maximum drawdown of -11.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFF and PRFD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPFFPRFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.92%

-11.93%

-23.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-3.28%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.51%

-6.28%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.61%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-2.23%

-1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

0.79%

+1.70%

Volatility

SPFF vs. PRFD - Volatility Comparison

Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) at 1.19%. This indicates that SPFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPFFPRFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

1.19%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

2.68%

+4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

3.21%

+6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.93%

4.88%

+6.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.51%

4.88%

+8.63%

SPFF vs. PRFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPFF has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than PRFD's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPFF vs. PRFD - Dividend Comparison

SPFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than PRFD's 5.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFD
PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
5.77%5.63%5.53%5.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
6.34%6.47%6.39%6.64%7.15%5.78%5.75%5.97%7.60%7.24%7.04%7.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPFF and PRFD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPFF has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to PRFD (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPFF dropped -35.92% vs PRFD's -11.93%.

On 3-year performance, PRFD leads with 9.23% vs 8.98% for SPFF. On fees, SPFF is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PRFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PRFD has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 8.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPFF is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for PRFD.

SPFF has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 5.77% for PRFD.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SPFF and 0.74% for PRFD.

PRFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPFF and PRFD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer