SPFA.DE vs. CGB.DE
SPFA.DE (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF) and CGB.DE (Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - SPFA.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond while CGB.DE tracks the FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond 1-10 Years Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPFA.DE returned 1.72%/yr vs 3.10%/yr for CGB.DE. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPFA.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CGB.DE.
Performance
SPFA.DE vs. CGB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPFA.DE achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than CGB.DE's 8.22% return.
SPFA.DE
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- 5.20%
- 3Y*
- 3.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- —
CGB.DE
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 6.23%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 9.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
SPFA.DE vs. CGB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPFA.DE SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF | 2.31% | 2.44% | 3.19% | 5.65% | -4.47% | -1.03% | -5.67% | 14.74% | -12.93% |
CGB.DE Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 8.22% | -6.58% | 9.93% | -2.82% | -0.10% | 15.85% | -0.38% | 4.86% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPFA.DE and CGB.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPFA.DE vs. CGB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SPFA.DE
CGB.DE
SPFA.DE vs. CGB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SPFA.DE) and Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (CGB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPFA.DE | CGB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.30 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 3.48 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 10.44 | -6.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPFA.DE vs. CGB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPFA.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, smaller than the maximum CGB.DE drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFA.DE and CGB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPFA.DE | CGB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -20.06% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.95% | -2.83% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.66% | -11.08% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.51% | -13.94% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.74% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.78% | -9.25% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.28% | 0.94% | +0.34% |
Volatility
SPFA.DE vs. CGB.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SPFA.DE) is 1.29%, while Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (CGB.DE) has a volatility of 1.51%. This indicates that SPFA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPFA.DE | CGB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.29% | 1.51% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.56% | 3.98% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.34% | 5.75% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.25% | 6.73% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.86% | 11.06% | -2.20% |
SPFA.DE vs. CGB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPFA.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CGB.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPFA.DE vs. CGB.DE - Dividend Comparison
SPFA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGB.DE Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.99% | 2.40% | 2.37% | 2.97% | 4.40% | 2.17% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 0.72% | 2.64% | 0.38% |
SPFA.DE SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPFA.DE and CGB.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGB.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGB.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPFA.DE.
SPFA.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond, while CGB.DE tracks FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond 1-10 Years Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPFA.DE and 0.20% for CGB.DE.
Find the right allocation for SPFA.DE and CGB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer