SPES.L vs. IMSU.L
SPES.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist) and IMSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SPES.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IMSU.L is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPES.L returned 9.32%/yr vs 6.07%/yr for IMSU.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPES.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IMSU.L.
Performance
SPES.L vs. IMSU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPES.L achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly lower than IMSU.L's 12.86% return.
SPES.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
IMSU.L
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 12.86%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 20.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- —
SPES.L vs. IMSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 9.18% | 3.95% | 13.66% | 8.18% | -1.34% | 28.07% |
IMSU.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.86% | 3.37% | 0.69% | 6.26% | -1.35% | 16.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPES.L and IMSU.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SPES.L and IMSU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPES.L vs. IMSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPES.L
IMSU.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Technology
SPES.L
IMSU.L
-
Financial Services
SPES.L
IMSU.L
-
Industrials
SPES.L
IMSU.L
-
Healthcare
SPES.L
IMSU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPES.L
IMSU.L
Consumer Defensive
SPES.L
IMSU.L
-
Real Estate
SPES.L
IMSU.L
-
Utilities
SPES.L
IMSU.L
-
Energy
SPES.L
IMSU.L
-
Basic Materials
SPES.L
IMSU.L
Communication Services
SPES.L
IMSU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPES.L vs. IMSU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPES.L
IMSU.L
SPES.L vs. IMSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) and iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPES.L | IMSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.24 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 1.91 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 6.43 | +5.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPES.L | IMSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.40 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.37 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.47 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
SPES.L vs. IMSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPES.L drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum IMSU.L drawdown of -28.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPES.L and IMSU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPES.L | IMSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -28.25% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.74% | -10.76% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.65% | -21.70% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.65% | -21.70% | +2.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.18% | +3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -5.56% | +1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 3.21% | -1.45% |
Volatility
SPES.L vs. IMSU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) is 2.04%, while iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that SPES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPES.L | IMSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 4.89% | -2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.43% | 11.86% | -5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.70% | 14.69% | -4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 16.33% | -2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 18.46% | -3.75% |
SPES.L vs. IMSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPES.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IMSU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPES.L vs. IMSU.L - Dividend Comparison
SPES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while IMSU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMSU.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 1.28% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 1.49% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPES.L and IMSU.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IMSU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IMSU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPES.L.
SPES.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IMSU.L is Materials. SPES.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IMSU.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPES.L and 0.15% for IMSU.L.
Find the right allocation for SPES.L and IMSU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer