PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEM vs. EEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEM vs. EEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than EEMX's 28.94% return.


SPEM

1D
-1.40%
1M
3.20%
YTD
12.45%
6M
14.11%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
9.45%

EEMX

1D
-1.31%
1M
9.99%
YTD
28.94%
6M
32.20%
1Y
58.43%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEM vs. EEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
12.45%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%
EEMX
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF
28.94%35.23%7.22%9.80%-19.75%-3.57%19.55%18.56%-16.76%38.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEM and EEMX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2016

0.88

The correlation between SPEM and EEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPEM vs. EEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPEM
EEMX

Technology

28.2%
38.7%

Financial Services

20.2%
20.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
10.1%

Industrials

8.5%
7.6%

Basic Materials

8.2%
6.3%

Communication Services

7.2%
7.3%

Energy

4.7%
0.5%

Healthcare

4.0%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
3.2%

Utilities

2.8%
1.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.1%

Technology

SPEM
28.2%
EEMX
38.7%

Financial Services

SPEM
20.2%
EEMX
20.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPEM
10.4%
EEMX
10.1%

Industrials

SPEM
8.5%
EEMX
7.6%

Basic Materials

SPEM
8.2%
EEMX
6.3%

Communication Services

SPEM
7.2%
EEMX
7.3%

Energy

SPEM
4.7%
EEMX
0.5%

Healthcare

SPEM
4.0%
EEMX
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPEM
3.9%
EEMX
3.2%

Utilities

SPEM
2.8%
EEMX
1.5%

Real Estate

SPEM
1.9%
EEMX
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEM vs. EEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMX
EEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEM vs. EEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPEMEEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.51

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

4.23

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

16.72

-6.58

SPEM vs. EEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the EEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEM and EEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPEMEEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.83

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.42

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.48

-0.25

Drawdowns

SPEM vs. EEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than EEMX's maximum drawdown of -39.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and EEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEMEEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-39.90%

-24.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-13.89%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-17.64%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-37.08%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-1.31%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.75%

-14.74%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

3.51%

-0.41%

Volatility

SPEM vs. EEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) is 5.69%, while SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that SPEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEMEEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

8.88%

-3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

18.19%

-4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

20.74%

-4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

19.15%

-2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

20.22%

-1.42%

SPEM vs. EEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPEM vs. EEMX - Dividend Comparison

SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than EEMX's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMX
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF
1.75%2.28%2.26%2.20%2.38%1.72%1.42%2.57%2.41%2.45%0.15%0.00%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.47%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SPEM and EEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EEMX has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to SPEM (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs EEMX's -39.90%.

On 5-year performance, EEMX leads with 8.07% vs 5.70% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SPEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EEMX has performed better with a 8.07% return vs 5.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EEMX.

SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 1.75% for EEMX.

SPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEMX is Asia Pacific Equities. SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while EEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SPEM and 0.30% for EEMX.

EEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEM and EEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer