SPECX vs. FBCGX
SPECX (Alger Spectra Fund) and FBCGX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SPECX returned 14.65%/yr vs 16.53%/yr for FBCGX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPECX charges 1.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FBCGX.
Performance
SPECX vs. FBCGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPECX achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly lower than FBCGX's 18.63% return.
SPECX
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 4.30%
- YTD
- 12.91%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 36.70%
- 3Y*
- 33.52%
- 5Y*
- 14.65%
- 10Y*
- 17.92%
FBCGX
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 18.63%
- 6M
- 18.09%
- 1Y
- 43.66%
- 3Y*
- 31.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SPECX vs. FBCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECX Alger Spectra Fund | 12.91% | 29.16% | 47.52% | 41.34% | -39.37% | 12.61% | 43.66% | 32.15% | -0.82% | 12.08% |
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund | 18.63% | 21.33% | 38.15% | 55.57% | -37.84% | 23.00% | 62.92% | 36.11% | -2.33% | 14.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPECX and FBCGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between SPECX and FBCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPECX vs. FBCGX — Risk / Return Rank
SPECX
FBCGX
SPECX vs. FBCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Spectra Fund (SPECX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPECX | FBCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 3.42 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 13.95 | -8.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPECX vs. FBCGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPECX drawdown since its inception was -72.19%, which is greater than FBCGX's maximum drawdown of -42.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPECX and FBCGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPECX | FBCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.19% | -42.55% | -29.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.03% | -12.64% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.91% | -26.83% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.82% | -42.55% | -12.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -0.32% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -8.86% | -15.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.43% | 3.09% | +3.34% |
Volatility
SPECX vs. FBCGX - Volatility Comparison
Alger Spectra Fund (SPECX) has a higher volatility of 9.66% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) at 8.16%. This indicates that SPECX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPECX | FBCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.66% | 8.16% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.59% | 14.95% | +3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.38% | 19.06% | +4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.88% | 25.18% | +7.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.98% | 24.93% | +3.05% |
SPECX vs. FBCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPECX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPECX vs. FBCGX - Dividend Comparison
SPECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than FBCGX's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund | 0.82% | 0.97% | 0.62% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 6.71% | 1.26% | 0.28% | 0.46% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPECX Alger Spectra Fund | 6.61% | 7.47% | 6.49% | 0.00% | 2.70% | 34.41% | 9.19% | 7.20% | 12.09% | 6.14% | 0.00% | 8.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SPECX and FBCGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPECX has higher volatility (9.66%) compared to FBCGX (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPECX dropped -72.19% vs FBCGX's -42.55%.
FBCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPECX and FBCGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer