PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPECX vs. FBCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPECX vs. FBCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Spectra Fund (SPECX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPECX achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly lower than FBCGX's 18.63% return.


SPECX

1D
2.28%
1M
4.30%
YTD
12.91%
6M
11.41%
1Y
36.70%
3Y*
33.52%
5Y*
14.65%
10Y*
17.92%

FBCGX

1D
2.12%
1M
5.28%
YTD
18.63%
6M
18.09%
1Y
43.66%
3Y*
31.10%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPECX vs. FBCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPECX
Alger Spectra Fund
12.91%29.16%47.52%41.34%-39.37%12.61%43.66%32.15%-0.82%12.08%
FBCGX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund
18.63%21.33%38.15%55.57%-37.84%23.00%62.92%36.11%-2.33%14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SPECX and FBCGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.96

The correlation between SPECX and FBCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPECX vs. FBCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPECX
SPECX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SPECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPECX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SPECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPECX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FBCGX
FBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPECX vs. FBCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Spectra Fund (SPECX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPECXFBCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.42

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

13.95

-8.41

SPECX vs. FBCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPECX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the FBCGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPECX and FBCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPECX vs. FBCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPECX drawdown since its inception was -72.19%, which is greater than FBCGX's maximum drawdown of -42.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPECX and FBCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPECXFBCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.19%

-42.55%

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.03%

-12.64%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.91%

-26.83%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.82%

-42.55%

-12.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.32%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.01%

-8.86%

-15.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

3.09%

+3.34%

Volatility

SPECX vs. FBCGX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Spectra Fund (SPECX) has a higher volatility of 9.66% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) at 8.16%. This indicates that SPECX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPECXFBCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.66%

8.16%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.59%

14.95%

+3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.38%

19.06%

+4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.88%

25.18%

+7.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.98%

24.93%

+3.05%

SPECX vs. FBCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPECX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCGX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPECX vs. FBCGX - Dividend Comparison

SPECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than FBCGX's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBCGX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund
0.82%0.97%0.62%0.26%0.12%6.71%1.26%0.28%0.46%0.13%0.00%0.00%
SPECX
Alger Spectra Fund
6.61%7.47%6.49%0.00%2.70%34.41%9.19%7.20%12.09%6.14%0.00%8.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SPECX and FBCGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPECX has higher volatility (9.66%) compared to FBCGX (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPECX dropped -72.19% vs FBCGX's -42.55%.

FBCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPECX and FBCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer