PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDV vs. USFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDV vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.58% return.


SPDV

1D
0.35%
1M
3.08%
YTD
14.63%
6M
15.97%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*

USFR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.96%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDV vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
14.63%10.90%14.40%5.45%-2.27%29.54%-6.09%20.46%-6.59%3.65%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
1.58%4.23%5.47%5.18%1.98%-0.03%0.56%2.02%2.01%0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and USFR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDV vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDV vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDVUSFRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

14.83

-12.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

48.59

-45.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

12.58

-11.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

203.63

-198.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.31

767.72

-753.41

SPDV vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 14.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDVUSFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

14.83

-12.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

9.27

-8.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

3.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.60

-1.14

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and USFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDVUSFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-1.36%

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-0.02%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-0.06%

-18.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-0.18%

-21.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-0.16%

-6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.01%

+2.00%

Volatility

SPDV vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that SPDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDVUSFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

0.06%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

0.18%

+7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

0.27%

+11.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

0.40%

+15.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

0.81%

+19.51%

SPDV vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDV vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.30%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%0.00%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
3.91%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDV and USFR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDV has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs USFR's -1.36%.

On 5-year performance, SPDV leads with 8.27% vs 3.67% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPDV has performed better with a 8.27% return vs 3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SPDV.

USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.30% for SPDV.

SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while USFR is Government Bonds. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.15% for USFR.

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.83 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDV and USFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer