SPDN vs. SARK
SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SPDN is passively managed, while SARK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPDN returned -11.24%/yr vs -27.37%/yr for SARK. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPDN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
SPDN vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDN achieves a -6.85% return, which is significantly higher than SARK's -8.35% return.
SPDN
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- -12.68%
- 3Y*
- -11.24%
- 5Y*
- -8.03%
- 10Y*
- -12.22%
SARK
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 1Y
- -17.72%
- 3Y*
- -27.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -6.85% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -15.04% | 18.63% | -1.95% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -8.35% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 24.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDN and SARK is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SPDN and SARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDN vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
SPDN
SARK
SPDN vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPDN | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.94 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | -0.68 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | -1.19 | -0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPDN vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDN drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, smaller than the maximum SARK drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDN and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDN | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -81.07% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.93% | -26.34% | +10.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.24% | -74.42% | +36.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.91% | -79.77% | +4.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.79% | -47.16% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.28% | 14.88% | -6.60% |
Volatility
SPDN vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) is 4.18%, while Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a volatility of 10.16%. This indicates that SPDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDN | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 10.16% | -5.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 26.83% | -16.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 36.04% | -23.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 55.93% | -38.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 55.93% | -37.92% |
SPDN vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPDN vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
SPDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than SARK's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.07% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.33% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDN and SARK have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to SPDN (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDN dropped -75.31% vs SARK's -81.07%.
On 3-year performance, SPDN leads with -11.24% vs -27.37% for SARK. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPDN has performed better with a -11.24% return vs -27.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SARK.
SPDN has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 3.07% for SARK.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPDN and 0.75% for SARK.
SARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.49 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDN and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer