SPDN vs. MSFD
SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) and MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion - SPDN tracks the S&P 500 Index while MSFD tracks the Microsoft Corporation (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPDN returned -11.24%/yr vs -3.82%/yr for MSFD. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPDN charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MSFD.
Performance
SPDN vs. MSFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDN achieves a -6.85% return, which is significantly lower than MSFD's 19.79% return.
SPDN
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- -12.68%
- 3Y*
- -11.24%
- 5Y*
- -8.03%
- 10Y*
- -12.22%
MSFD
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 1Y
- 25.82%
- 3Y*
- -3.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN vs. MSFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -6.85% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -15.04% | 1.26% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 19.79% | -13.36% | -7.86% | -35.90% | 3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDN and MSFD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPDN and MSFD has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDN vs. MSFD — Risk / Return Rank
SPDN
MSFD
SPDN vs. MSFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPDN | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.19 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 1.12 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 3.58 | -5.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPDN vs. MSFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDN drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than MSFD's maximum drawdown of -59.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDN and MSFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDN | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -59.90% | -15.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.93% | -23.25% | +7.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.24% | -40.50% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.91% | -45.97% | -28.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.79% | -41.64% | -7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.28% | 7.23% | +1.05% |
Volatility
SPDN vs. MSFD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) is 4.18%, while Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that SPDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDN | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 10.57% | -6.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 23.99% | -13.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 27.34% | -14.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 26.39% | -9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 26.39% | -8.38% |
SPDN vs. MSFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFD's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPDN vs. MSFD - Dividend Comparison
SPDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, which matches MSFD's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 3.30% | 3.33% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.33% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDN and MSFD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFD has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to SPDN (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDN dropped -75.31% vs MSFD's -59.90%.
On 3-year performance, MSFD leads with -3.82% vs -11.24% for SPDN. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MSFD has performed better with a -3.82% return vs -11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.
SPDN has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 3.30% for MSFD.
SPDN tracks S&P 500 Index, while MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPDN and 1.06% for MSFD.
MSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDN and MSFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer