SPD vs. NRSH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPD (Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SPD is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. Over the past year, SPD returned 14.01% vs 58.80% for NRSH. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPD charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.

Performance

SPD vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPD achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 47.92% return.

SPD

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 5.09%
• YTD: 6.70%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 14.01%
• 3Y*: 17.87%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: —

NRSH

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 13.93%
• YTD: 47.92%
• 6M: 46.01%
• 1Y: 58.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPD vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF	6.70%	18.86%	17.49%	4.13%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	47.92%	12.95%	-6.17%	8.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SPD and NRSH is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023	0.60

The correlation between SPD and NRSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPD vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPD	NRSH
Technology	35.6%	35.5%
Financial Services	11.8%	-
Communication Services	11.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	-
Healthcare	8.5%	-
Industrials	8.3%	58.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	2.5%
Utilities	2.4%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	5.8%
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

SPD vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPD

SPD Risk / Return Rank: 27
SPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
SPD Omega Ratio Rank: 27
SPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SPD Martin Ratio Rank: 27

NRSH

NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 76
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPD vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPD	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	2.42	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	3.11	-1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.40	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	5.40	-4.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.67	16.86	-13.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPD vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPD and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPD	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	2.42	-1.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	1.11	-0.42

Drawdowns

SPD vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPD drawdown since its inception was -27.38%, which is greater than NRSH's maximum drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPD and NRSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPD	NRSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.38%	-24.01%	-3.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.90%	-10.94%	-0.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	0.00%	-0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.72%	-5.62%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	3.50%	+0.32%

Volatility

SPD vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) is 3.35%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that SPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPD	NRSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	9.21%	-5.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.60%	20.27%	-11.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.22%	24.44%	-11.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.04%	21.54%	-5.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.98%	21.54%	-5.56%

SPD vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPD has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPD vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

SPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than NRSH's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	0.28%	0.42%	0.90%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF	0.96%	0.97%	1.14%	1.91%	1.64%	0.88%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPD and NRSH in my portfolio?

SPD and NRSH have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPD or NRSH?

NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to SPD (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPD dropped -27.38% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

Which ETF is better, SPD or NRSH?

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 14.01% for SPD. On fees, SPD is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, SPD has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPD or NRSH?

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 14.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPD or NRSH?

SPD is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPD or NRSH?

SPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.

What is the main difference between SPD and NRSH?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SPD and 0.75% for NRSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.