SPD vs. FJUN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SPD (Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF) and FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SPD is actively managed, while FJUN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPD returned 8.23%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for FJUN. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPD charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FJUN.

Performance

SPD vs. FJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPD achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly higher than FJUN's 4.84% return.

SPD

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 6.22%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 16.20%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 8.23%
• 10Y*: —

FJUN

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 4.84%
• 6M: 4.78%
• 1Y: 14.16%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: 10.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPD vs. FJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF	6.22%	18.86%	17.49%	20.94%	-25.96%	24.81%	8.06%
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	4.84%	11.05%	16.38%	22.30%	-4.95%	11.47%	6.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SPD and FJUN is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020	0.86

The correlation between SPD and FJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPD vs. FJUN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPD	FJUN
Technology	39.9%	39.0%
Financial Services	11.0%	11.1%
Communication Services	10.5%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	9.9%
Healthcare	8.2%	8.3%
Industrials	7.7%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	4.5%
Energy	3.2%	3.1%
Utilities	2.0%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

SPD vs. FJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPD

SPD Risk / Return Rank: 32
SPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
SPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
SPD Omega Ratio Rank: 32
SPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
SPD Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FJUN

FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 84
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPD vs. FJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPD	FJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	2.54	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	3.89	-2.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.55	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	3.44	-2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.23	19.85	-15.62

SPD vs. FJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the FJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPD and FJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPD vs. FJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPD drawdown since its inception was -27.38%, which is greater than FJUN's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPD and FJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPD	FJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.38%	-13.26%	-14.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.90%	-4.13%	-7.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.18%	-13.26%	-1.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.38%	-13.26%	-14.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-0.17%	-0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.67%	-1.66%	-6.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	0.72%	+3.12%

Volatility

SPD vs. FJUN - Volatility Comparison

Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) at 0.44%. This indicates that SPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPD	FJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	0.44%	+4.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.33%	4.33%	+5.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.60%	5.61%	+7.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.13%	10.55%	+5.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.00%	10.24%	+5.76%

SPD vs. FJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPD has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than FJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPD vs. FJUN - Dividend Comparison

SPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF	0.96%	0.97%	1.14%	1.91%	1.64%	0.88%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPD and FJUN in my portfolio?

SPD and FJUN have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPD or FJUN?

SPD has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to FJUN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPD dropped -27.38% vs FJUN's -13.26%.

Which ETF is better, SPD or FJUN?

On 5-year performance, FJUN leads with 10.79% vs 8.23% for SPD. On fees, SPD is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPD or FJUN?

Over the 5-year period, FJUN has performed better with a 10.79% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPD or FJUN?

SPD is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPD or FJUN?

SPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.

What is the main difference between SPD and FJUN?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SPD and 0.85% for FJUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.