PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPBX vs. OCTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPBX vs. OCTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPBX having a 6.99% return and OCTB slightly higher at 7.27%.


SPBX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.81%
6M
5.96%
YTD
6.99%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.89%

OCTB

1D
0.58%
1M
0.86%
6M
6.48%
YTD
7.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$58.52K$94.12K$66.59K
$439.67K$807.70K$429.46K

SPBX vs. OCTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPBX and OCTB is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPBX vs. OCTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPBX
SPBX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SPBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SPBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPBX vs. OCTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPBXOCTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.19

SPBX vs. OCTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPBX vs. OCTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBX drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, which is greater than OCTB's maximum drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBX and OCTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPBXOCTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.11%

-4.79%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-0.66%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

Volatility

SPBX vs. OCTB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPBXOCTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.69%

7.16%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.10%

7.16%

+1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.10%

7.16%

+1.94%

SPBX vs. OCTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPBX vs. OCTB - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPBX nor OCTB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SPBX and OCTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBX.

SPBX and OCTB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBX and 0.25% for OCTB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPBX and OCTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer