SPBX vs. MART
SPBX (AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF) and MART (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPBX is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while MART is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPBX returned 14.18% vs 19.17% for MART. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPBX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for MART.
Performance
SPBX vs. MART - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPBX achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly lower than MART's 7.16% return.
SPBX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 5.05%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 14.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MART
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 19.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPBX vs. MART - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPBX AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF | 5.05% | 9.86% |
MART Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF | 7.16% | 14.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPBX and MART is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2025 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SPBX and MART has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPBX vs. MART — Risk / Return Rank
SPBX
MART
SPBX vs. MART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPBX | MART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.56 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.63 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.47 | 20.33 | -4.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPBX | MART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.69 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.75 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
SPBX vs. MART - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPBX drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, roughly equal to the maximum MART drawdown of -11.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBX and MART.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPBX | MART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.11% | -11.61% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.49% | -5.30% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -1.28% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -0.90% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.95% | -0.03% |
Volatility
SPBX vs. MART - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) is 1.13%, while Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that SPBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MART based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPBX | MART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 1.66% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.60% | 5.73% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.62% | 7.17% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.41% | 9.70% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.41% | 9.70% | -0.29% |
SPBX vs. MART - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPBX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MART's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPBX vs. MART - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPBX nor MART has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SPBX and MART move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MART has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to SPBX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBX dropped -11.11% vs MART's -11.61%.
On 1-year performance, MART leads with 19.17% vs 14.18% for SPBX. On fees, MART is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SPBX has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MART has performed better with a 19.17% return vs 14.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MART is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBX.
SPBX and MART have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SPBX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MART is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBX and 0.74% for MART.
MART currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPBX and MART
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer