PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPBX vs. APRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPBX vs. APRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBX achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly lower than APRT's 9.15% return.


SPBX

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.55%
YTD
5.05%
6M
5.64%
1Y
14.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRT

1D
-0.85%
1M
0.52%
YTD
9.15%
6M
9.90%
1Y
18.64%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPBX vs. APRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPBX and APRT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2025

0.95

The correlation between SPBX and APRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPBX vs. APRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPBX
SPBX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SPBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SPBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

APRT
APRT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
APRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
APRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPBX vs. APRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPBXAPRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.92

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

11.77

-8.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.47

63.11

-47.65

SPBX vs. APRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is lower than the APRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPBX and APRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPBXAPRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

3.68

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

1.09

+0.06

Drawdowns

SPBX vs. APRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBX drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, smaller than the maximum APRT drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBX and APRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPBXAPRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.11%

-14.98%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-1.59%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.87%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.15%

-2.05%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.30%

+0.62%

Volatility

SPBX vs. APRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) is 1.13%, while AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that SPBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPBXAPRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

1.26%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.60%

4.10%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.62%

5.10%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.41%

10.78%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.41%

10.29%

-0.88%

SPBX vs. APRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRT's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPBX vs. APRT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPBX nor APRT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
APRT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.67%
SPBX
AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SPBX and APRT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

APRT has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to SPBX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBX dropped -11.11% vs APRT's -14.98%.

On 1-year performance, APRT leads with 18.64% vs 14.18% for SPBX. On fees, APRT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SPBX has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, APRT has performed better with a 18.64% return vs 14.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APRT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBX.

SPBX and APRT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SPBX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while APRT is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBX and 0.74% for APRT.

APRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPBX and APRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer