SPBU vs. FLJJ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SPBU (AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF) and FLJJ (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPBU is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while FLJJ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPBU returned 21.80% vs 15.29% for FLJJ. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPBU charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FLJJ.

Performance

SPBU vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBU achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than FLJJ's 4.98% return.

SPBU

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 4.89%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 6M: 8.80%
• 1Y: 21.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLJJ

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 6M: 5.80%
• 1Y: 15.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPBU vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPBU AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF	8.95%	13.85%
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	4.98%	12.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SPBU and FLJJ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025	0.92

The correlation between SPBU and FLJJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPBU vs. FLJJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPBU	FLJJ
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SPBU vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPBU

SPBU Risk / Return Rank: 68
SPBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
SPBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
SPBU Omega Ratio Rank: 68
SPBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SPBU Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FLJJ

FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 89
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPBU vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPBU	FLJJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	3.02	-0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	4.67	-1.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.65	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	3.98	-0.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.63	20.87	-7.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPBU vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPBU Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FLJJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPBU and FLJJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPBU	FLJJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	3.02	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.64	2.14	-0.50

Drawdowns

SPBU vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBU drawdown since its inception was -8.30%, which is greater than FLJJ's maximum drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBU and FLJJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPBU	FLJJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.30%	-6.91%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.10%	-3.86%	-3.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.05%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.25%	-0.78%	-0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	0.73%	+0.89%

Volatility

SPBU vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) has a higher volatility of 2.55% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) at 0.86%. This indicates that SPBU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPBU	FLJJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	0.86%	+1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.94%	3.59%	+3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.44%	5.10%	+4.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.65%	6.21%	+5.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.65%	6.21%	+5.44%

SPBU vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBU has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJJ's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPBU vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPBU nor FLJJ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPBU and FLJJ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SPBU and FLJJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPBU or FLJJ?

SPBU has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to FLJJ (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBU dropped -8.30% vs FLJJ's -6.91%.

Which ETF is better, SPBU or FLJJ?

On 1-year performance, SPBU leads with 21.80% vs 15.29% for FLJJ. On fees, FLJJ is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, FLJJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPBU or FLJJ?

Over the 1-year period, SPBU has performed better with a 21.80% return vs 15.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPBU or FLJJ?

FLJJ is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPBU or FLJJ?

SPBU and FLJJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SPBU and FLJJ?

SPBU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FLJJ is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBU and 0.74% for FLJJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.