PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPBC vs. CTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPBC vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBC achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 21.95% return.


SPBC

1D
-0.90%
1M
3.04%
YTD
7.71%
6M
7.18%
1Y
21.45%
3Y*
28.29%
5Y*
15.96%
10Y*

CTAP

1D
-0.32%
1M
-3.24%
YTD
21.95%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPBC vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPBC and CTAP is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.23

SPBC vs. CTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPBC
CTAP

Technology

35.6%

-

Financial Services

11.8%
49.3%

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

SPBC
35.6%
CTAP

-

Financial Services

SPBC
11.8%
CTAP
49.3%

Communication Services

SPBC
11.2%
CTAP

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPBC
10.1%
CTAP

-

Healthcare

SPBC
8.5%
CTAP

-

Industrials

SPBC
8.3%
CTAP

-

Consumer Defensive

SPBC
4.9%
CTAP

-

Energy

SPBC
3.5%
CTAP

-

Utilities

SPBC
2.4%
CTAP

-

Real Estate

SPBC
1.9%
CTAP

-

Basic Materials

SPBC
1.8%
CTAP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPBC vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPBC
SPBC Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SPBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPBC Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SPBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPBC Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

CTAP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPBC vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPBCCTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

SPBC vs. CTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPBCCTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

2.50

-1.71

Drawdowns

SPBC vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBC drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBC and CTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPBCCTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-9.02%

-24.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-4.47%

+3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-2.18%

-6.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

Volatility

SPBC vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPBCCTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

23.94%

-9.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

23.94%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.39%

23.94%

-3.55%

SPBC vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPBC vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

SPBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than CTAP's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CTAP
Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF
0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPBC
Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF
0.83%0.85%0.98%3.79%0.60%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPBC and CTAP have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPBC.

SPBC has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.65% for CTAP.

Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPBC and 0.10% for CTAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPBC and CTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer