PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPBAX vs. SCDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPBAX vs. SCDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Multi-Asset Conservative Allocation Fund (SPBAX) and DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBAX achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than SCDGX's 9.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SPBAX has underperformed SCDGX with an annualized return of 5.15%, while SCDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.86% annualized return.


SPBAX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.19%
6M
3.54%
YTD
3.62%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
3.10%
10Y*
5.15%

SCDGX

1D
0.44%
1M
-2.13%
6M
8.70%
YTD
9.24%
1Y
19.89%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
14.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPBAX vs. SCDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPBAX
DWS Multi-Asset Conservative Allocation Fund
3.62%9.25%6.57%11.18%-14.64%8.26%8.33%16.33%-6.07%10.93%
SCDGX
DWS Core Equity Fund
9.24%16.32%20.01%25.55%-15.61%25.54%16.14%35.68%-6.06%21.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SPBAX and SCDGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.91

The correlation between SPBAX and SCDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPBAX vs. SCDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPBAX
SPBAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SCDGX
SCDGX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SCDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPBAX vs. SCDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Multi-Asset Conservative Allocation Fund (SPBAX) and DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPBAXSCDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.21

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

8.91

-0.28

SPBAX vs. SCDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the SCDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPBAX and SCDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPBAX vs. SCDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBAX drawdown since its inception was -42.82%, smaller than the maximum SCDGX drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBAX and SCDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPBAXSCDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.82%

-55.85%

+13.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-9.54%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.28%

-20.72%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-22.77%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.90%

-35.07%

+15.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-2.45%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.42%

-8.56%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

2.35%

-1.33%

Volatility

SPBAX vs. SCDGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Multi-Asset Conservative Allocation Fund (SPBAX) is 2.15%, while DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that SPBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPBAXSCDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

5.15%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.38%

10.17%

-5.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.32%

12.78%

-7.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.87%

17.19%

-9.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.15%

18.37%

-10.22%

SPBAX vs. SCDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBAX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPBAX vs. SCDGX - Dividend Comparison

SPBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.25%, more than SCDGX's 9.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCDGX
DWS Core Equity Fund
9.58%10.50%9.11%5.12%9.28%14.09%6.70%8.88%14.12%6.15%6.92%8.72%
SPBAX
DWS Multi-Asset Conservative Allocation Fund
11.25%10.51%5.39%4.26%2.46%7.53%4.50%2.23%1.90%1.84%2.05%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPBAX and SCDGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCDGX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to SPBAX (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBAX dropped -42.82% vs SCDGX's -55.85%.

SPBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPBAX and SCDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer