PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPAX vs. LBAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPAX vs. LBAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF (SPAX) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPAX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LBAY

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
6.38%
6M
7.19%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPAX vs. LBAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPAX
Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF
0.00%0.02%5.11%6.63%1.25%2.19%
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
6.38%4.08%-3.49%-8.54%22.41%7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SPAX and LBAY is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021

0.01

SPAX vs. LBAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPAX
LBAY

Financial Services

100.0%
15.3%

Basic Materials

-

20.8%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

16.3%

Energy

-

11.4%

Healthcare

-

5.5%

Industrials

-

12.5%

Real Estate

-

2.8%

Technology

-

2.8%

Utilities

-

11.2%

Financial Services

SPAX
100.0%
LBAY
15.3%

Basic Materials

SPAX

-

LBAY
20.8%

Communication Services

SPAX

-

LBAY

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPAX

-

LBAY
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPAX

-

LBAY
16.3%

Energy

SPAX

-

LBAY
11.4%

Healthcare

SPAX

-

LBAY
5.5%

Industrials

SPAX

-

LBAY
12.5%

Real Estate

SPAX

-

LBAY
2.8%

Technology

SPAX

-

LBAY
2.8%

Utilities

SPAX

-

LBAY
11.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPAX vs. LBAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPAX

LBAY
LBAY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LBAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBAY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LBAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBAY Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPAX vs. LBAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF (SPAX) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPAX vs. LBAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPAXLBAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

Drawdowns

SPAX vs. LBAY - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPAXLBAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.66%

Volatility

SPAX vs. LBAY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPAXLBAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.73%

SPAX vs. LBAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPAX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than LBAY's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPAX vs. LBAY - Dividend Comparison

SPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LBAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
3.80%3.80%3.77%3.47%2.74%2.96%0.29%
SPAX
Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF
0.00%0.00%5.50%7.54%0.97%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPAX and LBAY have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPAX is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPAX is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for LBAY.

LBAY has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 0.00% for SPAX.

SPAX is categorized as Event Driven, while LBAY is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SPAX and 1.09% for LBAY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPAX and LBAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer