SPAQ vs. CNCR
Compare and contrast key facts about Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR).
SPAQ and CNCR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPAQ is an actively managed fund by Horizon. It was launched on Jun 29, 2007. CNCR is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2015.
Performance
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | -0.83% |
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
SPAQ
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPAQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPAQ vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank
SPAQ
CNCR
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPAQ | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.85 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPAQ | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | — | — |
Dividends
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison
SPAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.66%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 16.66% | 16.69% | 3.00% | 2.60% |
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPAQ drawdown since its inception was -5.30%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAQ and CNCR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPAQ | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | 0.00% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | 0.00% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | 0.00% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.42% | — | — |
Volatility
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPAQ | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.59% | 0.00% | +8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 0.00% | +7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 0.00% | +7.04% |