SPAQ vs. CNCR
SPAQ (Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. SPAQ is actively managed, while CNCR is passively managed. SPAQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.
Performance
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPAQ
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 1.82% |
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% |
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPAQ
CNCR
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SPAQ
CNCR
Industrials
SPAQ
CNCR
-
Basic Materials
SPAQ
-
CNCR
-
Communication Services
SPAQ
-
CNCR
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPAQ
-
CNCR
-
Consumer Defensive
SPAQ
-
CNCR
-
Energy
SPAQ
-
CNCR
-
Healthcare
SPAQ
-
CNCR
Real Estate
SPAQ
-
CNCR
-
Technology
SPAQ
-
CNCR
-
Utilities
SPAQ
-
CNCR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPAQ vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank
SPAQ
CNCR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPAQ | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPAQ drawdown since its inception was -5.30%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAQ and CNCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPAQ | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | 0.00% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | 0.00% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | 0.00% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | — | — |
Volatility
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPAQ | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.62% | 0.00% | +8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.95% | 0.00% | +6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.95% | 0.00% | +6.95% |
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPAQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPAQ vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison
SPAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.16%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 16.16% | 16.69% | 3.00% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CNCR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNCR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPAQ.
SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.16%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SPAQ and 0.79% for CNCR.
Find the right allocation for SPAQ and CNCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer