PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPAB vs. NUBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPAB vs. NUBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF (SPAB) and Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPAB achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than NUBD's 0.20% return.


SPAB

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.14%
1Y
5.24%
3Y*
3.93%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
1.54%

NUBD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.09%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
-0.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPAB vs. NUBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPAB
SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF
0.29%7.25%1.25%5.56%-13.04%-1.77%7.39%8.67%-0.18%0.45%
NUBD
Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.20%6.75%1.31%5.42%-12.90%-2.19%7.17%8.22%0.32%0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPAB and NUBD is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2017

0.90

The correlation between SPAB and NUBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPAB vs. NUBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPAB
SPAB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SPAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPAB Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPAB Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

NUBD
NUBD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NUBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUBD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
NUBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUBD Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPAB vs. NUBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF (SPAB) and Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPABNUBDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.81

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.72

5.38

+0.34

SPAB vs. NUBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the NUBD Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPAB and NUBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPABNUBDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.32

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

-0.01

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.29

+0.21

Drawdowns

SPAB vs. NUBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPAB drawdown since its inception was -18.56%, roughly equal to the maximum NUBD drawdown of -19.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAB and NUBD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPABNUBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.56%

-19.45%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-2.76%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.08%

-5.94%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-17.90%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-3.93%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-6.05%

+2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.93%

-0.01%

Volatility

SPAB vs. NUBD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF (SPAB) is 1.15%, while Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that SPAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPABNUBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.23%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.57%

2.61%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

3.79%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.92%

5.99%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.54%

5.12%

+0.42%

SPAB vs. NUBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPAB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than NUBD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPAB vs. NUBD - Dividend Comparison

SPAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than NUBD's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUBD
Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.99%3.90%3.51%2.99%2.83%2.05%2.21%2.66%3.08%0.58%0.00%0.00%
SPAB
SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF
4.05%3.97%3.86%3.34%2.59%2.11%2.43%2.92%2.96%2.67%2.63%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SPAB and NUBD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NUBD has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to SPAB (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPAB dropped -18.56% vs NUBD's -19.45%.

On 5-year performance, SPAB leads with 0.07% vs -0.06% for NUBD. On fees, SPAB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPAB has performed better with a 0.07% return vs -0.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPAB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for NUBD.

SPAB has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 3.99% for NUBD.

SPAB is categorized as Total Bond Market, while NUBD is Intermediate Core Bond. SPAB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while NUBD tracks Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPAB and 0.15% for NUBD.

SPAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPAB and NUBD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer