SOYB vs. CGUI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SOYB (Teucrium Soybean Fund) and CGUI (Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOYB is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark, while CGUI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group. SOYB is passively managed, while CGUI is actively managed. Over the past year, SOYB returned 14.47% vs 4.42% for CGUI. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. SOYB charges 1.88%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CGUI.

Performance

SOYB vs. CGUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOYB achieves a 12.90% return, which is significantly higher than CGUI's 1.50% return.

SOYB

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: 12.90%
• 6M: 6.01%
• 1Y: 14.47%
• 3Y*: -0.07%
• 5Y*: 0.26%
• 10Y*: 1.86%

CGUI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.84%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOYB vs. CGUI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund	12.90%	1.77%	-9.06%
CGUI Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF	1.50%	4.99%	3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SOYB and CGUI is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024	-0.08

Return for Risk

SOYB vs. CGUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOYB

SOYB Risk / Return Rank: 30
SOYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SOYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SOYB Omega Ratio Rank: 29
SOYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SOYB Martin Ratio Rank: 28

CGUI

CGUI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CGUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CGUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CGUI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CGUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CGUI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOYB vs. CGUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SOYB	CGUI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	5.99	-4.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	10.92	-9.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	2.66	-1.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	24.99	-23.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.06	105.06	-101.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SOYB vs. CGUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOYB Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the CGUI Sharpe Ratio of 5.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOYB and CGUI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SOYB	CGUI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	5.99	-4.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	6.20	-6.20

Drawdowns

SOYB vs. CGUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOYB drawdown since its inception was -53.76%, which is greater than CGUI's maximum drawdown of -0.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOYB and CGUI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOYB	CGUI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.76%	-0.18%	-53.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-0.18%	-8.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.80%	-0.04%	-15.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.76%	-0.02%	-25.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	0.04%	+3.53%

Volatility

SOYB vs. CGUI - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) at 0.30%. This indicates that SOYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOYB	CGUI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	0.30%	+3.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.94%	0.56%	+8.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	0.74%	+12.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.00%	0.80%	+17.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	0.80%	+16.18%

SOYB vs. CGUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOYB has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than CGUI's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOYB vs. CGUI - Dividend Comparison

SOYB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CGUI Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF	3.89%	4.17%	2.62%
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOYB and CGUI in my portfolio?

SOYB and CGUI have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOYB or CGUI?

SOYB has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to CGUI (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOYB dropped -53.76% vs CGUI's -0.18%.

Which ETF is better, SOYB or CGUI?

On 1-year performance, SOYB leads with 14.47% vs 4.42% for CGUI. On fees, CGUI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CGUI has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOYB or CGUI?

Over the 1-year period, SOYB has performed better with a 14.47% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOYB or CGUI?

CGUI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for SOYB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOYB or CGUI?

CGUI has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 0.00% for SOYB.

What is the main difference between SOYB and CGUI?

SOYB is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while CGUI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for SOYB and 0.18% for CGUI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGUI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.99 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.