SOXX vs. MTUM
SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOXX returned 35.55%/yr vs 17.15%/yr for MTUM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOXX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
SOXX vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXX achieves a 98.11% return, which is significantly higher than MTUM's 29.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXX has outperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 35.55%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively lower 17.15% annualized return.
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 17.25%
- YTD
- 98.11%
- 6M
- 99.51%
- 1Y
- 171.57%
- 3Y*
- 53.00%
- 5Y*
- 33.69%
- 10Y*
- 35.55%
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 8.76%
- YTD
- 29.72%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 42.02%
- 3Y*
- 33.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.15%
SOXX vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 98.11% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 29.72% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXX and MTUM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SOXX and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOXX vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXX
MTUM
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SOXX
MTUM
Basic Materials
SOXX
-
MTUM
Communication Services
SOXX
-
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
SOXX
-
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
SOXX
-
MTUM
Energy
SOXX
-
MTUM
Financial Services
SOXX
-
MTUM
Healthcare
SOXX
-
MTUM
Industrials
SOXX
-
MTUM
Real Estate
SOXX
-
MTUM
Utilities
SOXX
-
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXX vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
SOXX
MTUM
SOXX vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOXX | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.36 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.50 | 3.55 | +6.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.20 | 13.66 | +24.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOXX vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXX drawdown since its inception was -70.21%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXX and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXX | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.21% | -34.08% | -36.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.77% | -11.54% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.36% | -20.99% | -20.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.75% | -32.28% | -13.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.75% | -34.08% | -11.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -1.55% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -6.20% | -13.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 2.99% | +1.34% |
Volatility
SOXX vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a higher volatility of 19.42% compared to iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) at 10.89%. This indicates that SOXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXX | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.42% | 10.89% | +8.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.46% | 18.63% | +12.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 20.87% | +16.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.73% | 20.94% | +15.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.77% | 21.20% | +12.57% |
SOXX vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXX vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
SOXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than MTUM's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.61% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXX and MTUM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (19.42%) compared to MTUM (10.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXX dropped -70.21% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.55% vs 17.15% for MTUM. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTUM has been the lower-risk option at 10.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.55% return vs 17.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SOXX.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.
SOXX is categorized as Semiconductors, while MTUM is Momentum. SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for SOXX and 0.15% for MTUM.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.43 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXX and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer