SOXS vs. MUU
SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%), while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. SOXS charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
SOXS vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SOXS
- 1D
- 22.42%
- 1M
- -47.74%
- YTD
- -93.50%
- 6M
- -93.24%
- 1Y
- -97.76%
- 3Y*
- -87.41%
- 5Y*
- -80.25%
- 10Y*
- -79.54%
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXS vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 2.28% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXS and MUU is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXS vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
SOXS
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SOXS vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOXS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.63 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOXS vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXS and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -26.28% | -73.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -26.28% | -73.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.61% | -10.19% | -82.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.48% | — | — |
Volatility
SOXS vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 66.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 100.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.32% | 295.32% | -178.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 111.39% | 295.32% | -183.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.09% | 295.32% | -193.23% |
SOXS vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXS has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXS vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.05%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 83.05% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXS and MUU have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 83.05%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
SOXS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for SOXS and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for SOXS and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer