SOXS vs. MULL
SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SOXS is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, SOXS returned -97.83% vs 6388.53% for MULL. At a correlation of -0.73, they often move in opposite directions. SOXS charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
SOXS vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXS achieves a -91.68% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 907.48% return.
SOXS
- 1D
- -17.41%
- 1M
- -60.17%
- YTD
- -91.68%
- 6M
- -91.80%
- 1Y
- -97.83%
- 3Y*
- -86.41%
- 5Y*
- -79.75%
- 10Y*
- -78.81%
MULL
- 1D
- 5.57%
- 1M
- 246.94%
- YTD
- 907.48%
- 6M
- 1,268.17%
- 1Y
- 6,388.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXS vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -91.68% | -85.53% | 6.24% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 907.48% | 558.51% | -40.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXS and MULL is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | -0.73 |
The correlation between SOXS and MULL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.73 to -0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXS vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
SOXS
MULL
SOXS vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOXS | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | 49.08 | -50.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | 7.09 | -11.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.58 | 1.90 | -1.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 130.56 | -131.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 439.01 | -440.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOXS | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | 49.08 | -50.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | 7.34 | -8.13 |
Drawdowns
SOXS vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXS and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXS | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -72.29% | -27.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.64% | -53.09% | -44.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | 0.00% | -100.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.60% | -20.67% | -71.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.48% | 15.79% | +54.69% |
Volatility
SOXS vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) is 44.74%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.71%. This indicates that SOXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXS | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.74% | 55.71% | -10.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.91% | 105.59% | -21.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.16% | 132.53% | -30.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.22% | 136.39% | -28.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.49% | 136.39% | -35.90% |
SOXS vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXS has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXS vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.90%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 64.90% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXS and MULL have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (55.71%) compared to SOXS (44.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXS dropped -100.00% vs MULL's -72.29%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6388.53% vs -97.83% for SOXS. On fees, SOXS is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, SOXS has been the lower-risk option at 44.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6388.53% return vs -97.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXS is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 64.90%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for SOXS and 1.50% for MULL.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (49.08 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXS and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer