SOXQ vs. XDAT
SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) and XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while XDAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. SOXQ is passively managed, while XDAT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SOXQ returned 29.96%/yr vs -1.18%/yr for XDAT. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SOXQ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XDAT.
Performance
SOXQ vs. XDAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXQ achieves a 72.20% return, which is significantly higher than XDAT's 3.58% return.
SOXQ
- 1D
- 6.53%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 53.12%
- YTD
- 72.20%
- 1Y
- 117.36%
- 3Y*
- 49.65%
- 5Y*
- 29.96%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 30.79%
XDAT
- 1D
- 4.12%
- 1M
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 1Y
- -0.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- -1.18%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $214.44M | $218.73M | $282.51M | |
| $46.19K | $25.47K | $17.21K |
SOXQ vs. XDAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 72.20% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 25.19% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 3.58% | 1.87% | 16.54% | 45.77% | -45.71% | 8.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXQ and XDAT is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SOXQ and XDAT has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SOXQ vs. XDAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXQ
XDAT
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SOXQ
XDAT
Financial Services
SOXQ
XDAT
Basic Materials
SOXQ
-
XDAT
-
Communication Services
SOXQ
-
XDAT
Consumer Cyclical
SOXQ
-
XDAT
Consumer Defensive
SOXQ
-
XDAT
-
Energy
SOXQ
-
XDAT
-
Healthcare
SOXQ
-
XDAT
Industrials
SOXQ
-
XDAT
Real Estate
SOXQ
-
XDAT
Utilities
SOXQ
-
XDAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXQ vs. XDAT — Risk / Return Rank
SOXQ
XDAT
SOXQ vs. XDAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOXQ | XDAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.02 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | -0.01 | +4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.72 | -0.01 | +16.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOXQ vs. XDAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXQ drawdown since its inception was -46.01%, smaller than the maximum XDAT drawdown of -54.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXQ and XDAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXQ | XDAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.01% | -54.87% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.56% | -29.56% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.36% | -29.56% | -9.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.01% | -54.87% | +8.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.72% | -13.35% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.93% | -25.72% | +12.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.05% | 14.90% | -7.85% |
Volatility
SOXQ vs. XDAT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a higher volatility of 17.65% compared to Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) at 8.26%. This indicates that SOXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXQ | XDAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.65% | 8.26% | +9.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.94% | 21.20% | +16.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.80% | 25.55% | +18.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.40% | 29.74% | +8.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.01% | 29.41% | +8.60% |
SOXQ vs. XDAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXQ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XDAT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXQ vs. XDAT - Dividend Comparison
SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, while XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.30% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXQ and XDAT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (17.65%) compared to XDAT (8.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXQ dropped -46.01% vs XDAT's -54.87%.
On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 29.96% vs -1.18% for XDAT. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XDAT has been the lower-risk option at 8.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 29.96% return vs -1.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.
SOXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.
SOXQ is categorized as Semiconductors, while XDAT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOXQ and 0.50% for XDAT.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXQ and XDAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer