PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOXL vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOXL vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOXL achieves a 525.03% return, which is significantly higher than TNA's 53.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXL has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 64.43%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.99% annualized return.


SOXL

1D
-6.36%
1M
82.23%
YTD
525.03%
6M
481.71%
1Y
1,280.87%
3Y*
133.82%
5Y*
46.78%
10Y*
64.43%

TNA

1D
4.51%
1M
8.55%
YTD
53.14%
6M
43.09%
1Y
130.31%
3Y*
31.74%
5Y*
-5.38%
10Y*
7.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOXL vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
525.03%54.91%-12.31%226.98%-85.66%118.84%70.04%231.83%-39.07%141.71%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
53.14%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SOXL and TNA is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010

0.70

The correlation between SOXL and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

SOXL vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SOXL
TNA

Technology

100.0%
16.9%

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.4%

Energy

-

6.2%

Financial Services

-

15.9%

Healthcare

-

16.5%

Industrials

-

17.5%

Real Estate

-

6.2%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Technology

SOXL
100.0%
TNA
16.9%

Basic Materials

SOXL

-

TNA
4.8%

Communication Services

SOXL

-

TNA
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SOXL

-

TNA
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

SOXL

-

TNA
2.4%

Energy

SOXL

-

TNA
6.2%

Financial Services

SOXL

-

TNA
15.9%

Healthcare

SOXL

-

TNA
16.5%

Industrials

SOXL

-

TNA
17.5%

Real Estate

SOXL

-

TNA
6.2%

Utilities

SOXL

-

TNA
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOXL vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOXL
SOXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SOXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOXL vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOXLTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+10.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.32

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

29.80

4.03

+25.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

102.14

13.27

+88.87

SOXL vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOXL Sharpe Ratio is 12.69, which is higher than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOXL and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOXLTNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69

2.30

+10.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

-0.08

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.12

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.23

+0.28

Drawdowns

SOXL vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOXL drawdown since its inception was -90.46%, roughly equal to the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXL and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOXLTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.46%

-88.09%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.47%

-32.53%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.88%

-65.78%

-22.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.46%

-82.36%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.46%

-88.09%

-2.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.36%

-35.23%

+28.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.01%

-33.90%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.66%

9.86%

+2.80%

Volatility

SOXL vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a higher volatility of 41.05% compared to Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) at 17.02%. This indicates that SOXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOXLTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.05%

17.02%

+24.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

81.57%

40.45%

+41.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.16%

57.06%

+45.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.25%

67.34%

+39.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.05%

68.42%

+30.63%

SOXL vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOXL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOXL vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than TNA's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
0.03%0.34%1.18%0.51%1.07%0.04%0.05%0.38%1.30%0.09%4.84%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.39%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOXL and TNA have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXL has higher volatility (41.05%) compared to TNA (17.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXL dropped -90.46% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 64.43% vs 7.99% for TNA. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 17.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 64.43% return vs 7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.

TNA has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.

SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index, while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOXL and 1.14% for TNA.

SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.69 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOXL and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer