SOXL vs. RXL
SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) and RXL (ProShares Ultra Health Care) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index while RXL tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOXL returned 63.20%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for RXL. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOXL charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for RXL.
Performance
SOXL vs. RXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXL achieves a 458.36% return, which is significantly higher than RXL's -4.01% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXL has outperformed RXL with an annualized return of 63.20%, while RXL has yielded a comparatively lower 12.72% annualized return.
SOXL
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- 27.38%
- YTD
- 458.36%
- 6M
- 462.65%
- 1Y
- 985.71%
- 3Y*
- 110.81%
- 5Y*
- 43.69%
- 10Y*
- 63.20%
RXL
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 9.11%
- YTD
- -4.01%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
SOXL vs. RXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 458.36% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care | -4.01% | 19.76% | -2.72% | -3.15% | -15.26% | 48.06% | 19.24% | 40.40% | 3.38% | 46.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXL and RXL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SOXL and RXL has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SOXL vs. RXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXL
RXL
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SOXL
RXL
-
Basic Materials
SOXL
-
RXL
-
Communication Services
SOXL
-
RXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SOXL
-
RXL
-
Consumer Defensive
SOXL
-
RXL
-
Energy
SOXL
-
RXL
-
Financial Services
SOXL
-
RXL
Healthcare
SOXL
-
RXL
Industrials
SOXL
-
RXL
-
Real Estate
SOXL
-
RXL
-
Utilities
SOXL
-
RXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXL vs. RXL — Risk / Return Rank
SOXL
RXL
SOXL vs. RXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) and ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOXL | RXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.14 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 22.91 | 0.98 | +21.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 74.51 | 2.28 | +72.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOXL vs. RXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXL drawdown since its inception was -90.46%, which is greater than RXL's maximum drawdown of -67.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXL and RXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXL | RXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.46% | -67.70% | -22.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.47% | -21.33% | -22.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.88% | -36.08% | -51.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.46% | -36.08% | -54.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.46% | -51.00% | -39.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.35% | -12.76% | -3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.99% | -15.85% | -19.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.35% | 9.17% | +4.18% |
Volatility
SOXL vs. RXL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a higher volatility of 58.17% compared to ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) at 10.03%. This indicates that SOXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXL | RXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 58.17% | 10.03% | +48.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.93% | 21.39% | +72.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.81% | 30.32% | +80.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.96% | 29.72% | +79.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.99% | 33.30% | +66.69% |
SOXL vs. RXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RXL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXL vs. RXL - Dividend Comparison
SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than RXL's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care | 1.51% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 0.18% | 0.32% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.93% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXL and RXL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (58.17%) compared to RXL (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXL dropped -90.46% vs RXL's -67.70%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 63.20% vs 12.72% for RXL. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RXL has been the lower-risk option at 10.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 63.20% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RXL.
RXL has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.
SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index, while RXL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOXL and 0.95% for RXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.99 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXL and RXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer