SOVF vs. RSHO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SOVF (Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund) and RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOVF returned -2.77% vs 62.97% for RSHO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

SOVF vs. RSHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOVF achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than RSHO's 39.40% return.

SOVF

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: -2.81%
• 6M: -3.32%
• 1Y: -2.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSHO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 9.15%
• YTD: 39.40%
• 6M: 36.53%
• 1Y: 62.97%
• 3Y*: 30.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOVF vs. RSHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	-2.81%	-4.38%	8.67%	14.18%
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	39.40%	19.23%	17.28%	16.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SOVF and RSHO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between SOVF and RSHO has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SOVF vs. RSHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SOVF	RSHO
Technology	32.9%	11.8%
Financial Services	16.6%	0.8%
Industrials	14.4%	74.2%
Healthcare	10.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	8.0%	-
Utilities	5.1%	-
Real Estate	3.7%	-
Communication Services	0.3%	-
Energy	0.3%	0.9%
Basic Materials	-	8.1%

Return for Risk

SOVF vs. RSHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOVF

SOVF Risk / Return Rank: 7
SOVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SOVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
SOVF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
SOVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
SOVF Martin Ratio Rank: 7

RSHO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOVF vs. RSHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOVF	RSHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	2.62	-2.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.17	3.41	-3.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.43	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	4.45	-4.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.39	16.97	-17.37

SOVF vs. RSHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOVF Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the RSHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOVF and RSHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOVF vs. RSHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOVF drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, smaller than the maximum RSHO drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOVF and RSHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOVF	RSHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.74%	-27.31%	+5.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.46%	-14.64%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.49%	0.00%	-14.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.41%	-4.27%	-3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.04%	3.83%	+3.21%

Volatility

SOVF vs. RSHO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) is 3.77%, while Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that SOVF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOVF	RSHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	9.26%	-5.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.12%	20.99%	-10.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.61%	24.93%	-10.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.17%	22.82%	-5.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.17%	22.82%	-5.65%

SOVF vs. RSHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SOVF and RSHO have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

SOVF vs. RSHO - Dividend Comparison

SOVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while RSHO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	0.21%	0.30%	0.26%	0.25%
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	0.80%	0.77%	0.30%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOVF and RSHO in my portfolio?

SOVF and RSHO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOVF or RSHO?

RSHO has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to SOVF (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOVF dropped -21.74% vs RSHO's -27.31%.

Which ETF is better, SOVF or RSHO?

On 1-year performance, RSHO leads with 62.97% vs -2.77% for SOVF. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, SOVF has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOVF or RSHO?

Over the 1-year period, RSHO has performed better with a 62.97% return vs -2.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOVF or RSHO?

SOVF and RSHO have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOVF or RSHO?

SOVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.21% for RSHO.

What is the main difference between SOVF and RSHO?

They also come from different issuers: Sovereign's and Tema.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.