PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOVF vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOVF vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOVF achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.33% return.


SOVF

1D
0.64%
1M
0.42%
YTD
-2.69%
6M
-3.34%
1Y
-2.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.45%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOVF vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
-2.69%-4.38%8.67%14.18%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.33%4.96%5.25%2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SOVF and IBIC is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOVF vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOVF
SOVF Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
SOVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOVF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
SOVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOVF Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOVF vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOVFIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-9.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

2.23

-1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

16.64

-16.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

59.19

-59.48

SOVF vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOVF Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOVF and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOVF vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOVF drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOVF and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOVFIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.74%

-0.90%

-20.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.46%

-0.27%

-14.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.39%

-0.17%

-14.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.39%

-0.10%

-7.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

0.08%

+6.92%

Volatility

SOVF vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.22%. This indicates that SOVF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOVFIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

0.22%

+3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

0.67%

+9.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.60%

0.89%

+13.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

1.57%

+15.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

1.57%

+15.63%

SOVF vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOVF vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

SOVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
0.79%0.77%0.30%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOVF and IBIC have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOVF has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to IBIC (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOVF dropped -21.74% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.44% vs -2.03% for SOVF. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.44% return vs -2.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOVF.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.79% for SOVF.

SOVF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Sovereign's and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOVF and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOVF and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer