SOVF vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SOVF (Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOVF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Sovereign's, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOVF returned -4.19% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

SOVF vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOVF achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.

SOVF

• 1D: -1.72%
• 1M: -1.84%
• YTD: -2.81%
• 6M: -0.11%
• 1Y: -4.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOVF vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	-2.81%	-4.38%	2.60%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SOVF and CSHP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	0.03

The correlation between SOVF and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SOVF vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SOVF	CSHP
Technology	31.6%	-
Financial Services	16.1%	0.1%
Industrials	14.3%	-
Healthcare	9.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	-
Utilities	5.2%	-
Real Estate	3.7%	-
Energy	2.1%	-
Communication Services	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-

Return for Risk

SOVF vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOVF

SOVF Risk / Return Rank: 6
SOVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
SOVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
SOVF Omega Ratio Rank: 6
SOVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
SOVF Martin Ratio Rank: 6

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOVF vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SOVF	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	11.91	-12.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	31.26	-31.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	7.44	-6.47
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	65.71	-66.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.62	432.16	-432.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SOVF vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOVF Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOVF and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SOVF	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	11.91	-12.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	10.75	-10.39

Drawdowns

SOVF vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOVF drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOVF and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOVF	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.74%	-0.08%	-21.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.46%	-0.06%	-14.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.49%	0.00%	-14.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.28%	-0.00%	-7.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.79%	0.01%	+6.78%

Volatility

SOVF vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that SOVF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOVF	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	0.07%	+3.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.14%	0.24%	+9.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.76%	0.33%	+14.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.25%	0.40%	+16.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.25%	0.40%	+16.85%

SOVF vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOVF vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

SOVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	0.80%	0.77%	0.30%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOVF and CSHP in my portfolio?

SOVF and CSHP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOVF or CSHP?

SOVF has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOVF dropped -21.74% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, SOVF or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs -4.19% for SOVF. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOVF or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOVF or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOVF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOVF or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.80% for SOVF.

What is the main difference between SOVF and CSHP?

SOVF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Sovereign's and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOVF and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.