SOVF vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

SOVF (Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOVF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Sovereign's, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. SOVF is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, SOVF returned -2.03% vs 1746.34% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SOVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

SOVF vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOVF achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 1,000.26% return.

SOVF

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: -2.69%
• 6M: -3.34%
• 1Y: -2.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 12.73%
• YTD: 1,000.26%
• 6M: 797.52%
• 1Y: 1,746.34%
• 3Y*: 116.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOVF vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	-2.69%	-4.38%	8.67%	14.18%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	1,000.26%	96.22%	-39.21%	6.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SOVF and BWET is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023	-0.01

Return for Risk

SOVF vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOVF

SOVF Risk / Return Rank: 7
SOVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SOVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
SOVF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
SOVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
SOVF Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOVF vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOVF	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	17.93	-18.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	6.48	-6.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.94	-0.95
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.14	57.70	-57.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.29	152.12	-152.41

SOVF vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOVF Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 17.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOVF and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOVF vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOVF drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOVF and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOVF	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.74%	-56.90%	+35.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.46%	-30.64%	+16.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.39%	0.00%	-14.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-23.81%	+16.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.00%	11.60%	-4.60%

Volatility

SOVF vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) is 3.78%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 25.50%. This indicates that SOVF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOVF	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	25.50%	-21.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.11%	88.99%	-78.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.60%	98.69%	-84.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.20%	70.46%	-53.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	70.46%	-53.26%

SOVF vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOVF vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

SOVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	0.79%	0.77%	0.30%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOVF and BWET in my portfolio?

SOVF and BWET have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOVF or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (25.50%) compared to SOVF (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOVF dropped -21.74% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, SOVF or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1746.34% vs -2.03% for SOVF. On fees, SOVF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SOVF has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOVF or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1746.34% return vs -2.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOVF or BWET?

SOVF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOVF or BWET?

SOVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between SOVF and BWET?

SOVF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Sovereign's and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOVF and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.93 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.