PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOUNW vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SOUNW vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoundHound AI, Inc. Warrant (SOUNW) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOUNW achieves a -47.41% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 61.90% return.


SOUNW

1D
-2.14%
1M
-10.73%
6M
-60.22%
YTD
-47.41%
1Y
-66.73%
3Y*
34.57%
5Y*
15.51%
10Y*

ASML

1D
-3.97%
1M
-7.38%
6M
35.19%
YTD
61.90%
1Y
116.93%
3Y*
33.12%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
34.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOUNW vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SOUNW
SoundHound AI, Inc. Warrant
-47.41%-69.90%3,356.94%122.93%-87.18%67.14%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
61.90%56.51%-7.70%39.91%-30.49%19.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SOUNW and ASML is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2021

0.16

The correlation between SOUNW and ASML shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SOUNW:

$2.79B

ASML:

$665.25B

EPS

SOUNW:

-$0.43

ASML:

€25.88

PS Ratio

SOUNW:

3.87

ASML:

17.38

PB Ratio

SOUNW:

1.34

ASML:

28.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

SOUNW:

$183.99M

ASML:

€33.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SOUNW:

$69.84M

ASML:

€17.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

SOUNW:

-$124.47M

ASML:

€12.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOUNW vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOUNW
SOUNW Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SOUNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOUNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOUNW Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SOUNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOUNW Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOUNW vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoundHound AI, Inc. Warrant (SOUNW) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOUNWASMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.37

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

6.59

-7.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

16.96

-18.11

SOUNW vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOUNW Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOUNW and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOUNW vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOUNW drawdown since its inception was -94.64%, which is greater than ASML's maximum drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOUNW and ASML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOUNWASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.64%

-90.00%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.42%

-17.85%

-64.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.36%

-45.38%

-43.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.64%

-56.84%

-37.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.18%

-13.24%

-75.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.19%

-28.07%

-33.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.92%

6.92%

+51.00%

Volatility

SOUNW vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SoundHound AI, Inc. Warrant (SOUNW) is 18.66%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 20.65%. This indicates that SOUNW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOUNWASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.66%

20.65%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.81%

36.84%

+43.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

114.43%

45.79%

+68.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

224.45%

43.07%

+181.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

221.41%

39.00%

+182.41%

Dividends

SOUNW vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

SOUNW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.51%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
SOUNW
SoundHound AI, Inc. Warrant
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SOUNW vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SoundHound AI, Inc. Warrant and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
44.20M
8.77B
(SOUNW) Total Revenue
(ASML) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SOUNW values in USD, ASML values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


SOUNW and ASML have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASML has higher volatility (20.65%) compared to SOUNW (18.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOUNW dropped -94.64% vs ASML's -90.00%.

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOUNW and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer