SOUN vs. FBCG
SOUN (SoundHound AI, Inc.) is a stock, while FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, SOUN returned 29.87%/yr vs 28.04%/yr for FBCG. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SOUN vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOUN achieves a -30.79% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's 11.31% return.
SOUN
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -18.05%
- YTD
- -30.79%
- 6M
- -40.77%
- 1Y
- -27.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBCG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 32.07%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- —
SOUN vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc. | -30.79% | -49.75% | 835.85% | 19.77% | -79.70% |
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 11.31% | 18.60% | 39.05% | 57.98% | -18.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOUN and FBCG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOUN vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank
SOUN
FBCG
SOUN vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOUN | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.29 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 2.12 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 8.07 | -8.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOUN vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOUN drawdown since its inception was -93.55%, which is greater than FBCG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOUN and FBCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOUN | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.55% | -43.56% | -49.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.43% | -15.17% | -57.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.65% | -27.89% | -47.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.52% | -4.71% | -66.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.93% | -11.45% | -55.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.29% | 3.99% | +41.30% |
Volatility
SOUN vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison
SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 7.21%. This indicates that SOUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOUN | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.69% | 7.21% | +10.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.15% | 15.09% | +37.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.70% | 19.38% | +61.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.27% | 25.90% | +110.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.27% | 25.77% | +110.50% |
Dividends
SOUN vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison
SOUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOUN and FBCG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOUN has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to FBCG (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOUN dropped -93.55% vs FBCG's -43.56%.
FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOUN and FBCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer