PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOUN vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOUN vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOUN achieves a -35.41% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.67% return.


SOUN

1D
-6.40%
1M
-21.18%
YTD
-35.41%
6M
-41.45%
1Y
-32.14%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOUN vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SOUN
SoundHound AI, Inc.
-35.41%-49.75%835.85%19.77%-79.70%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.67%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SOUN and BIL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOUN vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOUN
SOUN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SOUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOUN Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SOUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOUN Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOUN vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOUNBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-172.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

87.16

-86.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

352.24

-352.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

2,793.11

-2,793.80

SOUN vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOUN Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOUN and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOUN vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOUN drawdown since its inception was -93.55%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOUN and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOUNBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.55%

-0.78%

-92.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.43%

-0.01%

-72.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.65%

-0.01%

-75.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.42%

0.00%

-73.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.96%

-0.26%

-66.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.47%

0.00%

+46.47%

Volatility

SOUN vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) has a higher volatility of 20.34% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that SOUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOUNBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.34%

0.07%

+20.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.51%

0.14%

+52.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.86%

0.20%

+80.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

135.98%

0.26%

+135.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

135.98%

0.26%

+135.72%

Dividends

SOUN vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

SOUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.85%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
SOUN
SoundHound AI, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOUN and BIL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOUN has higher volatility (20.34%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOUN dropped -93.55% vs BIL's -0.78%.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.32 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOUN and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer