PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOS vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SOS vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SOS Limited (SOS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOS achieves a -23.74% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 11.85% return.


SOS

1D
0.95%
1M
-8.62%
YTD
-23.74%
6M
-15.40%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COST

1D
0.79%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
11.85%
6M
4.58%
1Y
-8.37%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
21.24%
10Y*
22.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOS vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SOS
SOS Limited
-23.74%13.93%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
11.85%-10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SOS and COST is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2025

-0.01

Fundamentals

EPS

SOS:

-$26.32

COST:

$26.51

PS Ratio

SOS:

0.01

COST:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

SOS:

$385.71M

COST:

$293.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SOS:

$9.30M

COST:

$11.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

SOS:

-$100.59M

COST:

$12.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SOS Limited

Costco Wholesale Corporation

Return for Risk

SOS vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOS

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SOS Limited (SOS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SOS vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOSCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.59

-0.70

Drawdowns

SOS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOS drawdown since its inception was -60.70%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOS and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOSCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.70%

-53.39%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.71%

-12.11%

-41.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.44%

-13.36%

-23.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.86%

Volatility

SOS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOSCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

145.27%

19.12%

+126.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.27%

22.73%

+122.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.27%

21.95%

+123.32%

Dividends

SOS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

SOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.56%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
SOS
SOS Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SOS vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SOS Limited and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B202120222023202420252026
64.70M
70.53B
(SOS) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SOS and COST have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOS and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer