SOLT vs. XRPZ
SOLT (2x Solana ETF) and XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) are both Blockchain funds. SOLT is actively managed, while XRPZ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SOLT charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XRPZ.
Performance
SOLT vs. XRPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLT achieves a -72.29% return, which is significantly lower than XRPZ's -39.28% return.
SOLT
- 1D
- 5.47%
- 1M
- 27.80%
- 6M
- -79.23%
- YTD
- -72.29%
- 1Y
- -89.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPZ
- 1D
- 4.31%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -47.87%
- YTD
- -39.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLT vs. XRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLT 2x Solana ETF | -72.29% | -11.53% |
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | -39.28% | -11.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLT and XRPZ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLT vs. XRPZ — Risk / Return Rank
SOLT
XRPZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SOLT vs. XRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Solana ETF (SOLT) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOLT | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOLT vs. XRPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLT drawdown since its inception was -96.28%, which is greater than XRPZ's maximum drawdown of -55.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLT and XRPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLT | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.28% | -55.39% | -40.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.76% | -51.93% | -42.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.62% | -33.68% | -22.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 74.21% | — | — |
Volatility
SOLT vs. XRPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLT | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 106.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.14% | 71.64% | +76.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 151.21% | 71.64% | +79.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 151.21% | 71.64% | +79.57% |
SOLT vs. XRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLT has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLT vs. XRPZ - Dividend Comparison
SOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, while XRPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SOLT 2x Solana ETF | 5.33% | 1.22% |
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLT and XRPZ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for SOLT.
SOLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.33%, compared with 0.00% for XRPZ.
They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 1.85% for SOLT and 0.19% for XRPZ.
Find the right allocation for SOLT and XRPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer