SOLT vs. BAMU

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

SOLT (2x Solana ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLT is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOLT returned -89.81% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SOLT charges 1.85%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

SOLT vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 2x Solana ETF (SOLT) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLT achieves a -72.29% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.36% return.

SOLT

• 1D: 5.47%
• 1M: 27.80%
• 6M: -79.23%
• YTD: -72.29%
• 1Y: -89.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 1.28%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOLT vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SOLT 2x Solana ETF	-72.29%	-55.52%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.36%	2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SOLT and BAMU is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

SOLT vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLT

SOLT Risk / Return Rank: 3
SOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
SOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 99
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLT vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Solana ETF (SOLT) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOLT	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.61	4.95	-5.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.11	8.73	-9.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	2.42	-1.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	24.36	-25.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	96.78	-97.99

SOLT vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOLT and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOLT vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLT drawdown since its inception was -96.28%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLT and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOLT	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.28%	-0.36%	-95.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.28%	-0.12%	-96.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.76%	-0.00%	-94.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.62%	-0.02%	-56.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	74.21%	0.03%	+74.18%

Volatility

SOLT vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

2x Solana ETF (SOLT) has a higher volatility of 42.51% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.08%. This indicates that SOLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOLT	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	42.51%	0.08%	+42.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	106.55%	0.36%	+106.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	148.14%	0.58%	+147.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	151.21%	0.86%	+150.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	151.21%	0.86%	+150.35%

SOLT vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOLT has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOLT vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

SOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
SOLT 2x Solana ETF	5.33%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOLT and BAMU in my portfolio?

SOLT and BAMU have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOLT or BAMU?

SOLT has higher volatility (42.51%) compared to BAMU (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLT dropped -96.28% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, SOLT or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.87% vs -89.81% for SOLT. On fees, BAMU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOLT or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.87% return vs -89.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOLT or BAMU?

BAMU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for SOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOLT or BAMU?

SOLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.33%, compared with 3.05% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between SOLT and BAMU?

SOLT is categorized as Blockchain, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.85% for SOLT and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.95 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.