SOLM vs. SILJ
SOLM (Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLM is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. SOLM is actively managed, while SILJ is passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOLM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
SOLM vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLM achieves a -45.35% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 6.61% return.
SOLM
- 1D
- -5.48%
- 1M
- -17.98%
- YTD
- -45.35%
- 6M
- -51.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILJ
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 111.95%
- 3Y*
- 47.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
SOLM vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLM Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | -45.35% | -15.50% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 6.61% | 35.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLM and SILJ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLM vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
SOLM
SILJ
SOLM vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (SOLM) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOLM | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.14 | 0.09 | -1.22 |
Drawdowns
SOLM vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLM drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLM and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLM | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.72% | -79.04% | +21.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.72% | -26.80% | -30.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.34% | -41.43% | +6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.06% | — |
Volatility
SOLM vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLM | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.43% | 54.90% | +10.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.43% | 44.35% | +21.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.43% | 46.24% | +19.19% |
SOLM vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLM vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
SOLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.68%, more than SILJ's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.88% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
SOLM Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | 35.68% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLM and SILJ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOLM.
SOLM has the higher dividend yield at 35.68%, compared with 1.88% for SILJ.
SOLM is categorized as Derivative Income, while SILJ is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOLM and 0.69% for SILJ.
Find the right allocation for SOLM and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer