SOLM vs. QDVO
SOLM (Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF) and QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Amplify. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOLM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for QDVO.
Performance
SOLM vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLM achieves a -47.60% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's 9.91% return.
SOLM
- 1D
- -4.12%
- 1M
- -23.48%
- YTD
- -47.60%
- 6M
- -52.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 26.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLM vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLM Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | -47.60% | -15.50% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 9.91% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLM and QDVO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLM vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank
SOLM
QDVO
SOLM vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (SOLM) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOLM | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.16 | 1.42 | -2.58 |
Drawdowns
SOLM vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLM drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLM and QDVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLM | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.46% | -17.75% | -41.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.46% | -0.84% | -58.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.51% | -2.36% | -33.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.51% | — |
Volatility
SOLM vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLM | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.39% | 12.21% | +53.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.39% | 17.42% | +47.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.39% | 17.42% | +47.97% |
SOLM vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLM vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison
SOLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.22%, more than QDVO's 10.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 10.11% | 9.92% | 2.79% |
SOLM Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | 37.22% | 6.44% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLM and QDVO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOLM.
SOLM has the higher dividend yield at 37.22%, compared with 10.11% for QDVO.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOLM and 0.56% for QDVO.
Find the right allocation for SOLM and QDVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer