SOLL.TO vs. SBT.TO
SOLL.TO (Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units) and SBT.TO (Purpose Silver Bullion Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLL.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while SBT.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. SOLL.TO is actively managed, while SBT.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, SOLL.TO returned -56.74% vs 106.59% for SBT.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOLL.TO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SBT.TO.
Performance
SOLL.TO vs. SBT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLL.TO achieves a -44.92% return, which is significantly lower than SBT.TO's 2.63% return.
SOLL.TO
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- -20.42%
- YTD
- -44.92%
- 6M
- -51.48%
- 1Y
- -56.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBT.TO
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 26.91%
- 1Y
- 106.59%
- 3Y*
- 42.76%
- 5Y*
- 18.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.88%
SOLL.TO vs. SBT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | -44.92% | -7.64% |
SBT.TO Purpose Silver Bullion Fund | 2.63% | 108.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLL.TO and SBT.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLL.TO vs. SBT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SOLL.TO
SBT.TO
SOLL.TO vs. SBT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) and Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOLL.TO | SBT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.35 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 2.51 | -3.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 5.36 | -6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOLL.TO | SBT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 | 1.82 | -2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 0.21 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
SOLL.TO vs. SBT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLL.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.76%, which is greater than SBT.TO's maximum drawdown of -47.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLL.TO and SBT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLL.TO | SBT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.76% | -47.82% | -24.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.76% | -42.69% | -30.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.76% | -37.23% | -35.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.73% | -16.92% | -17.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.42% | 19.98% | +25.44% |
Volatility
SOLL.TO vs. SBT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) and Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) have volatilities of 16.52% and 17.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLL.TO | SBT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.52% | 17.20% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.07% | 57.92% | -8.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.56% | 59.00% | +13.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.15% | 36.64% | +34.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.15% | 66.57% | +4.58% |
SOLL.TO vs. SBT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLL.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SBT.TO's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLL.TO vs. SBT.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SOLL.TO nor SBT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLL.TO and SBT.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SBT.TO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBT.TO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLL.TO.
SOLL.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SBT.TO is Silver. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SOLL.TO and 0.36% for SBT.TO.
Find the right allocation for SOLL.TO and SBT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer