SBT.TO vs. SVR-C.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR-C.TO).

SBT.TO and SVR-C.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SBT.TO is a passively managed fund by Purpose Investments that tracks the performance of the N/A (Physical Bullion). It was launched on May 25, 2016. SVR-C.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Mar 4, 2011. Both SBT.TO and SVR-C.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SBT.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR-C.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SBT.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SBT.TO Purpose Silver Bullion Fund	5.57%	137.07%	18.55%	-0.86%	1.99%	-13.18%	48.01%	13.31%	-12.82%	-17.07%
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF	6.54%	132.91%	30.61%	-2.65%	9.31%	-12.72%	43.88%	9.28%	-2.35%	-2.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBT.TO achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly lower than SVR-C.TO's 6.54% return.

SBT.TO

• 1D: 7.22%
• 1M: -18.70%
• YTD: 5.57%
• 6M: 59.78%
• 1Y: 112.02%
• 3Y*: 43.13%
• 5Y*: 23.29%
• 10Y*: —

SVR-C.TO

• 1D: 7.62%
• 1M: -18.18%
• YTD: 6.54%
• 6M: 59.80%
• 1Y: 109.49%
• 3Y*: 46.63%
• 5Y*: 26.62%
• 10Y*: 17.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBT.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBT.TO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than SVR-C.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.

SVR-C.TO

iShares Silver Bullion ETF

SBT.TO

Purpose Silver Bullion Fund

Return for Risk

SBT.TO vs. SVR-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBT.TO

SBT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
SBT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SBT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SBT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SBT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

SVR-C.TO

SVR-C.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SVR-C.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SVR-C.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SVR-C.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SVR-C.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBT.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SBT.TO	SVR-C.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	2.00	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.12	+0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.38	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	2.65	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.25	8.09	+0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SBT.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBT.TO and SVR-C.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBT.TO	SVR-C.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	2.00	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.81	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.24	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between SBT.TO and SVR-C.TO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SBT.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBT.TO nor SVR-C.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SBT.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBT.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.82%, smaller than the maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown of -61.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBT.TO and SVR-C.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBT.TO	SVR-C.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.82%	-61.14%	+13.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.69%	-41.54%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.69%	-41.54%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.43%	-34.09%	-1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.60%	-35.60%	+19.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.68%	13.62%	+0.06%

Volatility

SBT.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR-C.TO) have volatilities of 19.32% and 18.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBT.TO	SVR-C.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.32%	18.67%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.11%	54.74%	+2.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.02%	55.09%	+1.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.62%	35.76%	-0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.79%	33.06%	+33.73%