SOLL.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SOLL.TO (Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units) and CCCX-B.TO (CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOLL.TO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CCCX-B.TO.

Performance

SOLL.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLL.TO achieves a -44.92% return, which is significantly lower than CCCX-B.TO's -31.24% return.

SOLL.TO

• 1D: -4.36%
• 1M: -20.42%
• YTD: -44.92%
• 6M: -51.48%
• 1Y: -56.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCCX-B.TO

• 1D: -3.21%
• 1M: -20.20%
• YTD: -31.24%
• 6M: -36.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOLL.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units	-44.92%	-40.57%
CCCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)	-31.24%	-27.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SOLL.TO and CCCX-B.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025	0.33

Return for Risk

SOLL.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLL.TO

SOLL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3
SOLL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
SOLL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SOLL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SOLL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SOLL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLL.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SOLL.TO	CCCX-B.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.11	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SOLL.TO	CCCX-B.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.64	-1.27	+0.64

Drawdowns

SOLL.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLL.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.76%, which is greater than CCCX-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -55.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLL.TO and CCCX-B.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOLL.TO	CCCX-B.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.76%	-55.41%	-17.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.76%	-55.41%	-17.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.73%	-33.16%	-1.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.42%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SOLL.TO	CCCX-B.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.56%	47.23%	+25.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.15%	47.23%	+23.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.15%	47.23%	+23.92%

SOLL.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOLL.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CCCX-B.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOLL.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SOLL.TO nor CCCX-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOLL.TO and CCCX-B.TO in my portfolio?

SOLL.TO and CCCX-B.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SOLL.TO or CCCX-B.TO?

On fees, CCCX-B.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOLL.TO or CCCX-B.TO?

CCCX-B.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLL.TO.

What is the main difference between SOLL.TO and CCCX-B.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and CI Global Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SOLL.TO and 0.50% for CCCX-B.TO.